Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[Football] If Palace can't play in the Europa League



Dick Swiveller

Dick Swiveller

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2011
10,049
AI was never going to pull this off completely so this will have to do. Let's throw Ipswich into the mix.

1750173948987.png
 






seagullsovergrimsby

seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
44,155
Crap Town
Logically speaking UEFA have to throw Palace out of Europe. On March 1st Textor had too many shares in Palarse and Lyon , with Donner and Blitzen holding shares in Brondby as well. They are in the same exact position as Drogheda so CAS will come to the same conclusion when they appeal for forgiveness.
 










T

theboybilly

Well-known member
Apr 25, 2013
6,376
Along the Shoreham Road in er, Shoreham
If all Palace shareholders have 25% (with Parish having a casting vote if needed) how does Textor voting with the 2 other blokes to overrule Parish not be 'having influence' in matters? It's all a bit lost on me.
No matter, to my mind the March 1st deadline seals the argument - Palace didn't meet it - end of discussion
 


W

warmleyseagull

Well-known member
Apr 17, 2011
4,512
Beaminster, Dorset
Giraffe said:
I keep coming back to the fact that the bloke is the largest shareholder of the business. Regardless of how they say that works day to day it is inconceivable that the largest shareholder of a business does not have influence over the business.
Click to expand...
Exactly, and he had the opportunity to rectify in plenty of time. Rules are rules; might be pernickety but CP Board were aware of the rule and did nothing or were not aware, and they have done nothing since winning FA Cup when it was obviously going to be an issue. Either way negligent. I can't see there is any way they can be allowed to compete given the Drogheda precedent.
 






Jimmy Come Lately

Jimmy Come Lately

Registered Loser
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2011
524
Hove
kevo said:
Palace fan thinks there should be a play-off to decide if they or Lyon should qualify, even though the rules are quite clear on that point. :D:D:D They really are dim.

View attachment 204633
Click to expand...
Wait, so the suggestion is that because there could be a conflict of interest (or at least the appearance of one) if Palace and Lyon were to play each other in a competitive European fixture, the way to resolve it is... to play each other in a competitive European fixture?

I'm not sure this person has fully grasped the nature of the problem.
 


M

Mmkay

New member
Jun 9, 2025
3
Giraffe said:
I keep coming back to the fact that the bloke is the largest shareholder of the business. Regardless of how they say that works day to day it is inconceivable that the largest shareholder of a business does not have influence over the business.
Click to expand...

For me it's the fact that he's apparently a director at palace and the president at Lyon.

Rule 5.01b is that "No one may simultaneously be involved, either directly or indirectly, in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition"

I fully expect UEFA to find a way to let palace be in the Europa league, but I don't see how you can claim to not be involved in the adminstration of a club "in any capacity whatsoever" when you are a director there
 




Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,865
Goldstone
Jimmy Come Lately said:
Wait, so the suggestion is that because there could be a conflict of interest (or at least the appearance of one) if Palace and Lyon were to play each other in a competitive European fixture, the way to resolve it is... to play each other in a competitive European fixture?

I'm not sure this person has fully grasped the nature of the problem.
Click to expand...

:clap2:
 




Bozza

Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
59,172
Back in Sussex
Mmkay said:
For me it's the fact that he's apparently a director at palace and the president at Lyon.

Rule 5.01b is that "No one may simultaneously be involved, either directly or indirectly, in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition"

I fully expect UEFA to find a way to let palace be in the Europa league, but I don't see how you can claim to not be involved in the adminstration of a club "in any capacity whatsoever" when you are a director there
Click to expand...
Welcome to NSC - you're going to get along here just fine.
 










L

LadySeagull

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2011
1,266
Portslade
Mmkay said:
For me it's the fact that he's apparently a director at palace and the president at Lyon.

Rule 5.01b is that "No one may simultaneously be involved, either directly or indirectly, in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition"

I fully expect UEFA to find a way to let palace be in the Europa league, but I don't see how you can claim to not be involved in the administration of a club "in any capacity whatsoever" when you are a director there
Click to expand...
I don't expect Palace to get away with it due to that second criteria that you've quoted.

Whilst the third criteria has a caveat about 'influence' that one doesn't. To me it is cut & dried. I predict they're out. Banned.
 








You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here