Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...







Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
They have 80% of the media on their side, they have infiltrated the BBC and with Voter ID have also compromised the voting system in their favour.

At this time Labour look likely to form the next election but its by no means a given. In the meantime we're fast sliding towards a non-EU version of Orban's Hungary.

They are not finished the judiciary next, then go after Ofcom...
They’ve already tried Ofcom by trying to install Paul Dacre.
 


worthingseagull123

Well-known member
May 5, 2012
2,592
I am sure that we can all agree on the fact that the Conservatives have had 13 years of claiming to be dealing with this situation without making any improvements for anyone.

They make a lot of noise about being the party to deal with immigration and asylum seekers but the square root of all their efforts is f*** all.

It is an issue that serves they well in terms of getting votes. One has to wonder if they really have the motivation to put in place workable solutions or would rather pander to the masses with harsh systems that work for no-one.

The similarities between this speech and plan and Pritti Patel's from years ago are so similar, surely alarm bells are ringing.

After 13 years they are either incapable of making the system work or they don't want. Why anyone is willing to give them another try is beyond me.

We’ve had 13 years of cuts to Immigration Services and state provisions.

We are living with the consequences.
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
17,658
Gods country fortnightly
The government might think they are fooling the British people. They forget though, the world is watching. A world that we rely on, increasingly.
But I really don't think they care if the net result is self harm to the UK, their only concern is popularity and holding onto power. If joining Russia and Belarus in the cold outside the ECHR resulted in a them winning the red wall voters over they wouldn't give a toss.
 






















jcdenton08

Enemy of the People
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
10,843
NSC certainly isn’t all tolerance and light in politics threads! Big difference between being fanatical about a political party and just plain racism though…
 


DataPoint

Well-known member
Mar 31, 2015
432
I haven't visited this thread for month's - nothing's changed!

Gary Lineker is again is a hero by comparing the governments immigration strategy to that of the Nazi's in the 1930's .

If you are honest, if you are intelligent, if you are young or old and wise, if you pride yourself in wanting the truth - get yourself a copy of Thames Televisions 1970's acclaimed series "The World at War". Every episode is extraordinary but in the context of Gary's claim three episodes stand out -

"A New Germany (1933–1939)"

"The final solution Part One"

"The final solution Part Two"

You will see real evidence of the absolute depravity of human begins - you will see total hatred, humiliation, the destruction of civilization whipped up by mind-blowing propaganda - you will see the actual footage and stupefyingly horrific murder of men, women and children - not acted - real footage - with survivors harrowing interviews and on a scale utterly, utterly inconceivable.

If you do this, you will view poor old Gary with sympathy and sadness!

 








rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
4,598
At the moment Labour have all the power by virtue of staying quiet and not giving failing Tories any ammunition. The hustings and debates after manifesto is released don’t give Conservative strategists time to play the long PR game of slagging off Labour ideas for years before an election.

This is sensible to me.
Well, except the appointment of Sue Gray as his "Chief of Staff" (whatever that may be). Not only was that giving the Tories ammunition, but the gun to fire the ammunition as well, then shooting himself in the foot with it.

That shows a total lack of political judgement on Starmer's part. It was daft. Wait until the GE is done and dusted and THEN appoint her. His refusal to say when he first contacted Gray to offer her the job also stinks. If you having neither to hide Sir Starmer, why are you going to such lengths to hide it?
 


jcdenton08

Enemy of the People
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
10,843
You do wonder how Andrew Neil got away with being a political anchor on the Beeb for all those years whilst simultaneously being Chair of the Spectator magazine. Food for thought....
I found Neil on the whole impartial and a good host.
 


jcdenton08

Enemy of the People
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
10,843
Well, except the appointment of Sue Gray as his "Chief of Staff" (whatever that may be). Not only was that giving the Tories ammunition, but the gun to fire the ammunition as well, then shooting himself in the foot with it.

That shows a total lack of political judgement on Starmer's part. It was daft. Wait until the GE is done and dusted and THEN appoint her. His refusal to say when he first contacted Gray to offer her the job also stinks. If you having neither to hide Sir Starmer, why are you going to such lengths to hide it?
As I said earlier in the thread, it’s very poor optics. If it were the other away around it’d be “Tories manipulated Gray, typical sleaze” etc. But you’ll notice I don’t do political sniping or point scoring. I hate this government but wouldn’t be averse to voting Tory one day in the future if they were the right option for the country, on a constituency level or to keep others out.

Starmer could frankly be in the throes of a passionate sexual affair with Sue Gray right now for all I care and I’ll still vote Labour to get the Tories out.
 




rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
4,598
Only days before?

Im sure there will be many others with the same view as you on both sides of politics- voting for their party regardless of what is in the manifesto
Manifestos mean SFA anyway. Lots of promises which are never kept. I recall the last GE Labour manifesto gave a commitment to "respect the result of the Brexit referendum". They didn't. They argued and bickered and then came up with no policy whatsoever.

Manifestos are just pages of empty, hollow "promises". That is the way they have always been.
 


rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
4,598
As I said earlier in the thread, it’s very poor optics. If it were the other away around it’d be “Tories manipulated Gray, typical sleaze” etc. But you’ll notice I don’t do political sniping or point scoring. I hate this government but wouldn’t be averse to voting Tory one day in the future if they were the right option for the country, on a constituency level or to keep others out.

Starmer could frankly be in the throes of a passionate sexual affair with Sue Gray right now for all I care and I’ll still vote Labour to get the Tories out.
Of course. Me too. But he really didn't need all the bad press from "Graygate", which was of his own making, which has certainly diverted media attention away from more important and pressing issues.

I am far from convinced that Starmer is the astute politician we need to solve our country's woes. But I have no choice but to give him the chance.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here