Because he doesn’t need to stop him making a clearance, just impact on his ability. And the argument would be that he could make a better clearance with clear unobstructed sight of the ball.
The opposition don’t need to appeal for offside and the overhead kick in the eye line of the Leicester player clearly impacts him. Coming back from an offside position to challenge for the ball has always been interference.
Why bother if we aren’t going to spend what we don’t have would be a better question
Hard to strengthen a team which lost Buendia and Skipp last summer. But invested all the money we had poorly and the loan players have been a disaster. Funny how we’ve both improved loads since the 0-0...
Apparently only told after the match with the decision made on Thursday morning. The board members however did look unhappy when the camera panned to them during the game