Because he doesn’t need to stop him making a clearance, just impact on his ability. And the argument would be that he could make a better clearance with clear unobstructed sight of the ball.
The opposition don’t need to appeal for offside and the overhead kick in the eye line of the Leicester player clearly impacts him. Coming back from an offside position to challenge for the ball has always been interference.
Why bother if we aren’t going to spend what we don’t have would be a better question
Hard to strengthen a team which lost Buendia and Skipp last summer. But invested all the money we had poorly and the loan players have been a disaster. Funny how we’ve both improved loads since the 0-0...
Apparently only told after the match with the decision made on Thursday morning. The board members however did look unhappy when the camera panned to them during the game
Haha you might want to read the club accounts - it’s funny that some think their clubs spending millions on players and wages has nothing to do with having a rich benefactor 🤷*♂️
And just to add, covid hit hard for all clubs and left us with a £30m black hole. The sale of Buendia basically covered that so the £50m+ we’ve spent wasn’t exactly frugal
And when you don’t have the money, then you risking the long term future of the club
People think that the £100m+ you get for promotion means you can spend that on transfers, forgetting all the other costs involved like bonuses and commitment to years of huge wages they’d demand. You could...
The money we had was spent on promotion bonuses, new contracts,
paying off debt and redeveloping the training ground so not sure what we could have done to spend wisely unless you think we should have gambled (tried that and nearly crippled us) and left a substandard training ground which...