Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Alex Scott







Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP
Click bait within a thread where there's nothing to click, trolls for calling out sexism, criticising gender not being sexism. It's like you don't know what words mean.

You have a problem with criticism, did you have a bad childhood?
 












You are click bait.
You need to find out what internet terms mean. Clickbait is when you waste people's time by trying to get them to open something which they otherwise wouldn't have bothered with.
This is a classic example
https://www.northstandchat.com/showthread.php?370581-Oh-guess-what&highlight=

Click bait within a thread where there's nothing to click,
Now that's not actually true is it Ackers, I've counted at least 15 page number hyperlinks.
 


Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
7,904
Why would I be angry? I am merely calling you people out that feel it isn't right to criticise someone purely down to their gender. You are allowed to, it isn't rude, nasty, insensitive or sexist. It is a view. It is a view we are still allowed to air, it may be outlawed soon, but right now it is just trolls calling out people with views and hoping to click bait, El Presidente only managed to find two of you, but game won, better than none at all. I dislike women pundits in mens football and if that causes people to hang a rope around their necks, so be it. I stand with my views.

it is a view, but, a sexeist view. patrick moore spoke out against women reading out the news on the today programme, not specifically cos they were female, but cos he was a bit deaf, he couldn't hear their higher tones clearly, still sexsist, but at least he had some logic
 


rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
7,904
Why would I be angry? I am merely calling you people out that feel it isn't right to criticise someone purely down to their gender. You are allowed to, it isn't rude, nasty, insensitive or sexist. It is a view. It is a view we are still allowed to air, it may be outlawed soon, but right now it is just trolls calling out people with views and hoping to click bait, El Presidente only managed to find two of you, but game won, better than none at all. I dislike women pundits in mens football and if that causes people to hang a rope around their necks, so be it. I stand with my views.

oh, and all the swearing and abruptness does come across as quite angry
 


Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP
it is a view, but, a sexeist view. patrick moore spoke out against women reading out the news on the today programme, not specifically cos they were female, but cos he was a bit deaf, he couldn't hear their higher tones clearly, still sexsist, but at least he had some logic

oh, and all the swearing and abruptness does come across as quite angry

Swearing is part of my vocabulary, for better or worse. I don't really care what Patrick Moore said or your interpretation. This thread is called Alex Scott and I am against her being a pundit on mens Prem football, it really is that simple. I am also against Redknapp and Carragher. But the latter two played the game so I will endure their dross. The former didn't, so she has as much right to be there as you or I. You can keep your liberalism and stick it so far north it is to cold to snow.
 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
7,904
Swearing is part of my vocabulary, for better or worse. I don't really care what Patrick Moore said or your interpretation. This thread is called Alex Scott and I am against her being a pundit on mens Prem football, it really is that simple. I am also against Redknapp and Carragher. But the latter two played the game so I will endure their dross. The former didn't, so she has as much right to be there as you or I. You can keep your liberalism and stick it so far north it is to cold to snow.

so what is the point of your meandering, tiresome, nonsense?
 


dejavuatbtn

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2010
7,210
Henfield
it is a view, but, a sexeist view. patrick moore spoke out against women reading out the news on the today programme, not specifically cos they were female, but cos he was a bit deaf, he couldn't hear their higher tones clearly, still sexsist, but at least he had some logic

No, that’s tonist not “sexsist” (I think you mean sexist). I suspect if a male newsreader was grabbed by the balls then Patrick Moore would still have a problem.
 






Blues Rock DJ

New member
Apr 18, 2011
4,007
Dorset
Swearing is part of my vocabulary, for better or worse. I don't really care what Patrick Moore said or your interpretation. This thread is called Alex Scott and I am against her being a pundit on mens Prem football, it really is that simple. I am also against Redknapp and Carragher. But the latter two played the game so I will endure their dross. The former didn't, so she has as much right to be there as you or I. You can keep your liberalism and stick it so far north it is to cold to snow.

google her, I think you'll find you're wrong about her not having played the game ?
 














Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here