Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Southampton - next British club to be bought by the Chinese?



spence

British and Proud
Oct 15, 2014
9,821
Crawley
It has been discussed at PL meetings before. I can't see PL clubs abolishing promotion and relegation full stop, but they may be keen to move the pieces around by perhaps moving to 2 up 2 down, or have a play off between Championship club and third bottom etc.

Sky aren't interested in the arse end of the PL, it doesn't deliver in terms of ratings. All they want is United, Liverpool , Arsenal, Chelsea etc. A 'Super Sunday' of Swansea v Stoke, Bournemouth v Watford, Boro v Burnley and Palace v anyone is of no interest to the sad sacks who pay £1,000 a year and never go a live game.

By your logic the PL must have hated Leicester winning the league?
 














Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,395
Uffern
It has been discussed at PL meetings before. I can't see PL clubs abolishing promotion and relegation full stop, but they may be keen to move the pieces around by perhaps moving to 2 up 2 down, or have a play off between Championship club and third bottom etc.

Sky aren't interested in the arse end of the PL, it doesn't deliver in terms of ratings. All they want is United, Liverpool , Arsenal, Chelsea etc. A 'Super Sunday' of Swansea v Stoke, Bournemouth v Watford, Boro v Burnley and Palace v anyone is of no interest to the sad sacks who pay £1,000 a year and never go a live game.

The interesting question is: why haven't the PL clubs introduced two-up, two-down or even one-up, one-down? That would certainly be in their best financial interest. I don't know the answer, BTW, but I suspect that there's an agreement in place to stop it happening.

And yes, Sky is only interested in the top six clubs but there are only 30 games between them, what's going to happen the rest of the time? If there's no relegation, there's no incentive for the other 14 clubs to invest in players so there'll be a lot of sub-standard games.
 


super-seagulls

Soup! Why didn’t I get any Soup?
Feb 1, 2011
3,115
Probably working!
Arsenal
Liverpool
Everton
West Brom
Swansea
Palace (partially)
Southampton
Leicester
Manchester United
Manchester City
Sunderland
Chelsea
Spurs (registered in the Bahamas)
Bournemouth
Watford
Hull

English owned clubs are:
West Ham
Boro
Burnley
Stoke

16 foreign owners. It takes 14 clubs in the Premier League to change the constitution in relation to relegation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What are the Championship figures?
In fact while you are at it could you do us all 72 FL clubs?
 






El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,719
Pattknull med Haksprut
What are the Championship figures?
In fact while you are at it could you do us all 72 FL clubs?

Overseas Championship owners

VIlla (China)
Birmingham (China)
Wolves (China)
Cardiff (Malaysia)
Fulham (Pakistan)
Dirty Leeds (Italy)
Forest (Kuwait)
QPR (Malaysia/India)
Wednesday (Thailand)
Blackburn (India)

Rest are domestically owned, but it is still 40% foreign ownership in the Championship.

I don't have enough data on lower league clubs at present, sorry.
 
Last edited:


Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
Overseas Championship owners

VIlla (China)
Birmingham (China)
Wolves (China)
Cardiff (China)
Fulham (Pakistan)
Dirty Leeds (Italy)
Forest (Kuwait)
QPR (Malaysia/India)
Wednesday (Thailand)

Rest are domestically owned, but it is still 37.5% foreign ownership in the Championship.

I don't have enough data on lower league clubs at present, sorry.
Blackburn ?

Have the Venkys gone ?
 


Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
19,784
Eastbourne
Interesting article. Read many of the comments and this one stuck out lol!

0afcf480106eda92d6a3086e9fcdc5a3.jpg
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,241
Goldstone
This has been mentioned before but I still can't see it. I very much doubt that you could have a situation where relegation is stopped during that season
Presumably they could take a vote just after the last day of a season, so you have the new member and the next season hasn't yet started etc. Regardless of when such a vote was taken, I'd expect there to be legal challenges from those not in the PL.

That's before you consider whether Sky would chuck much money into a league where most of the games would have nothing riding on them
I hope you're right. I would certainly cancel Sky/BT etc immediately if it were to happen, regardless of whether we're in the PL or not. I can't put into words how bad it would be.

I do think there's a possibility of some games being moved to Asia though
I hope you're wrong, it goes against our footballing traditions.
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,719
Pattknull med Haksprut
The interesting question is: why haven't the PL clubs introduced two-up, two-down or even one-up, one-down? That would certainly be in their best financial interest. I don't know the answer, BTW, but I suspect that there's an agreement in place to stop it happening.

And yes, Sky is only interested in the top six clubs but there are only 30 games between them, what's going to happen the rest of the time? If there's no relegation, there's no incentive for the other 14 clubs to invest in players so there'll be a lot of sub-standard games.

There are incentives for clubs to do well though.

1: They still receive gate receipt and have commercial deals that generate revenues. If they put out shite teams then those two sources of income will disappear, and the fans will take to the pitchforks.
2: If there is a reduced form of relegation there is still a huge incentive to avoid it as the difference is about £50m a year (with parachute payments) and £95million once such payments cease.
3: Under the present split of TV money, 50% is given equally, 25% based on number of appearances on TV and 25% on position in the table. So again there is a financial inducement to do well.
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,719
Pattknull med Haksprut
I hope you're wrong, it goes against our footballing traditions.

So does kickoffs on a Friday and Monday night, Saturday lunchtime and most of Sunday, but if it suits the owners then the fans interests will be ignored as we have seen on countless previous occasions.

West Ham are charging £50 for kids tickets to see the lovely bunch of Eastenders play Arsenal (and £80 for an adult ticket). The tradition of football being a working class game has been extinguished by the novelty toy salesmen (and woman) who run the Hammers and many others.
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,241
Goldstone
So does kickoffs on a Friday and Monday night, Saturday lunchtime and most of Sunday, but if it suits the owners then the fans interests will be ignored as we have seen on countless previous occasions.
I don't think all fans are against the games at those times, I like being able to watch footy on the TV sometimes. Of course it means we don't get to go to many Saturday home games, but that's not a big deal to everyone.

Removing the home/away element to games is a completely different kettle of fish IMO.

West Ham are charging £50 for kids tickets
:eek: Bloody hell, that's outrageous.
The tradition of football being a working class game has been extinguished by the novelty toy salesmen (and woman) who run the Hammers and many others.
Well given that I'm not working class, I don't mind that football isn't just for the working class.
 




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
59,912
The Fatherland


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,719
Pattknull med Haksprut
I look to you for expertise on these things El P, but you're making me doubt you.

I am heading my head in shame.

I do however have a three page interview in NORWEGIAN out today. It's been a life long ambition of mine to appear in a Scandinavian publication.

http://www.liverpool.no/
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here