vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 28,234
Meanwhile elsewhere, Somerset chase down 400 to win by two wickets.
Impressive.
We'd need two innings to make that.
Meanwhile elsewhere, Somerset chase down 400 to win by two wickets.
Impressive.
We'd need four innings to make that.
We'd need two innings to make that.
This Dockrell seems QUALITY. Its a big relief that we did take the unecessary RISK of playing Beer or another of our own youngsters, who might have been EXPENSIVE.
This Dockrell seems QUALITY. Its a big relief that we did take the unecessary RISK of playing Beer or another of our own youngsters, who might have been EXPENSIVE.
At least this time Robbo won't be able to blame the pitch for our score: wonder whose fault it will be? The high calorie content of the Arundel teas? The wind blowing around the battlements? The trauma of the Henriques/Burns incident?
Good spell this 0/33 from 2 overs, Beer would have been TONKED to all corners of the ground.
Indeed. Beer must be crying in his cider at the moment.
Not Much all can say about this game.
Anyone want to buy a bet for Sussex to win the Division? It's £10e/w @ 10-1. I am open to any offers over £50. Would keep it but have a spare.
I'd suggest that Robbo's poistion, of not at risk, is certainly open to a great deal of scrutiny.
In football - as we saw last season, when you get in such a slump the manager generally loses their job. I wonder if this will apply here?
A football manager who, say, started the season without any competition for his defence so that they'd all play regardless of form; who had no wide players at all and who had five strikers but three were injured and one was on international duty a lot, would find his employment pretty quickly curtailed.
So I wonder if questions are being asked about a cricket coach who thinks we need no batting cover, no spinner and an array of fast bowlers with injury problems
Magnificent stuff. Let's hope he stays here permanently.Match figures of 0/180 for our star loan spinner. Well bowled, young man.