No I won't deal with it. She'll be around the Magistrates house tonight eating fine food and fine wine and probably get an apology from the Magistrate for wasting Lucas time.
Don't care, she's a politician and they all should be banged up.
Yes, but she's obviously used her privileged position to lean on the press not to reveal her age - all the co-defendants' ages were given. Bang her up.
You need to get out of your Bramber Castle, when is your Amex ban lifted ?
That ties back to Lucas. Lucas was going to be found not guilty either way so had to find anyone before her not guilty. Could you imagine the outrage if the protesters before her were found guilty and sent to prison and she got a not guilty, there'd be outrage. Would be interesting to see what the outcome would have been without Lucas involvement but we all know that outcome don't we.
After Forest away so be afraid, be very afraid Beachy boy and I'll see you again on the early away trains again from Shoreham
Are you paying attention to anything that's being said? Or are you just happy to continue your flight of fantasy through La-La Land to find the pixies at the bottom of the garden?
There have been dozens of protestors, arrested on the same charge as Caroline Lucas. The vast majority have been found 'not guilty'. Where was her involvement in that? Where did the parliamentary privilege / conspiracy come into play?
Do you honestly believe a backbench MP (with no 'friends' in the House) is capable of conspiring to pre-determine their own verdict? Actually, that's a stupid question. Of course you do...
You're correct. How about Maria Miller the Torie MP? Enough said.
Of course, he might be reeling you in...
Are you paying attention to anything that's being said? Or are you just happy to continue your flight of fantasty through La-La Land to find the pixies at the bottom of the garden?
There have been dozens of protestors, arrested on the same charge as Caroline Lucas. The vast majority have been found 'not guilty'. Where is the parliamentary privilege / conspiracy in that?
Do you honestly believe a backbench MP (with no 'friends' in the House) is capable of conspiring to pre-determine their own verdict? Actually, that's a stupid question. Of course you do...
It's about time you ventured outside and mixed with normal citizens because you seem to be in the land of Caroline Lucas and her power hungry gimps. They all live in the politician bubble and it just floats about in their own twisted imagination where they think they're always right and could never possibly be wrong. If you honestly think that her name and status didn't have any part in the outcome of the verdict then you're more naive than I thought you was.
Of course, he might be reeling you in...
Excellent, away days will be fun from next season.
Have you enjoyed your annexe at Selhurst ?
Don't care, she's a politician and they all should be banged up.
Anyone with a certain job should be jailed without cause?
Thank Christ you're not in charge of the country!
If I was in charge then Politicians and benefit cheats wouldn't flease the tax player again, they'd think long and hard before making false claims as the punishment would be fit for the crime. None of this you claimed/stole £50k so pay back 50p a week, it would be 10 years imprisonment. That'll put a stop to this complete and utter farce which is in place today which encourages people to commit benefit fraud as they know they'll be handed lollipops instead of time in a cell.
If you were in charge would you also put yourself through school again so you could improve your spelling and grammar?
No, he's normally like this.
He's actually being very consistent.
I don't genuinely think he's clever enough to be able to do that.