The Truth
Banned
Only problem is Ince has a contract that runs out at the end of the season. We might get nothing for him. It's not unusual for that to happen at the Albion.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Rohan Ince
- Thread starter ferring seagull
- Start date
Only problem is Ince has a contract that runs out at the end of the season. We might get nothing for him. It's not unusual for that to happen at the Albion.
Tubby-McFat-Fuc
Well-known member
How usual is it? With the expection of Murray, who Poyet chose to let go, who else has it happened with recently?
Also as he is under 24, we will get money regardless.
Tubby-McFat-Fuc
Well-known member
Of course nothings been mentioned. Why would the club mention it. I'd be amazed if we weren't working flat out to tie Kuszczak down for another yesr or two, but the club haven't mentioned that either.
The Truth
Banned
Davies went on a free didn't he? How much did Bolton pay for him?
Cox also went on a free. I'm sure he's worth a fare amount right now.
Vicente wasn't renewed a contract, not that I care but he's another one.
Cook is being touted around for the Prem, we didn't hold onto him either.
Last edited:
The Truth
Banned
oops sorry
Tubby-McFat-Fuc
Well-known member
Errr, can't recall Davies, but Cox was released, Vicente was released and Cook was sold (wrongly in my opinion). Very very very very very different to what you are stating about Ince. I'm sure he will not be released like the others, so you need not worry.
The Truth
Banned
I'm not worried at all. I'm just stating that it's not unusual for the Albion to lose players due to contract expiry. You can't really argue with that. I didn't even mention Murray!
Until he get's his contract extension, there's no point talking about the money we'll get for him.
(Russell Martin was released as a youth, but that's just being pedantic)
Mellor 3 Ward 4
Well-known member
I am still I'm Manchester,s hit faced, not eead thread yet, and not back from the game yet, but Ince was superb today
Bertiehuburn
New member
- Nov 19, 2010
- 26
i personally think that bridcutt and ince are very 2 different players in the same position. Ince has all the attributes that we have seen so far this season to be a very good player at the top level. but lets not forget that bridcutt is our player of the season 2 years running so its brave to compare them. i think bridcutt still has a bit more creativity which can provide impetus to attacking situations. but ince has the strength and on the ball ability to be a very good player. sign him up and let him show his adaptability but we need to keep bridcutt unless poyet wants to pay £4 mill plus
Hey... I'm just pleased to see that more and more folks are waking up to Ince's ability. Is that such a bad thing? Scoring points is really not my cup of tea as anyone who knows me will testify. Indeed, I'm more often than not critical of individual performances. But feel free to start some threads about other Brighton players if you want.
Last edited:
kalinski
Well-known member
I think a 4-2-3-1 with Ince and Bridcutt would very tasty
You seem to be confusing releasing players at the end of their contract because we no longer want them with losing players due to contract expiry.
Hotchilidog
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2009
- 8,757
That was by far and way Ince's best performance away from home this season. Up until yesterday he had not performed as well on his travels as he had at home. It was great to see him bring his home form to the game yesterday. What's exciting about him, is that he clearly still has a long way to go. Ince has the most amount of potential I have seen in one of our development players for a long time. I'd like to think the Vieira comparison will prove to be accurate.
skipper734
Registered ruffian
Absolutely bizarre examples, none of which are remotely the same
Vicente was deliberately not renewed.
Cox was deliberately not renewed.
Davies actually had a year left, and we agreed to release him early to get rid.
Cook was sold.
Once is obviously a class act, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. Next week it could all go wrong.
Wilka
Well-known member
The guy is class. We need to get him on a long term contract ASAP
Ince & Bridcutt in the middle with a choice of Andrews/Crofts/Orlandi/Forster-Caskey to play as the third midfielder, Buckley & LuaLua skinning people down the wings...
That midfield five would have me drooling, drooling a lot, especially with Ulloa up top.
That midfield five would have me drooling, drooling a lot, especially with Ulloa up top.
Ince & Bridcutt in the middle with a choice of Andrews/Crofts/Orlandi/Forster-Caskey to play as the third midfielder, Buckley & LuaLua skinning people down the wings...
That midfield five would have me drooling, drooling a lot, especially with Ulloa up top.
Why not play one of Bridcutt and Ince and then play TWO of Andrews/Crofts/Orlandi/Forster-Caskey though?
Finchley Seagull
New member
Ince & Bridcutt in the middle with a choice of Andrews/Crofts/Orlandi/Forster-Caskey to play as the third midfielder, Buckley & LuaLua skinning people down the wings...
That midfield five would have me drooling, drooling a lot, especially with Ulloa up top.
I would think Crofts is the logical choice to play alongside Bridcutt once he's fit. Ince will still get games and in harder away games, we may well play all three. Will be interesting to see where he plays Orlandi, who will almost certainly start when fully fit.
Interesting choices for OG when all are fit.