Some of the low ratings on here make me wonder if Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea players are being used as a bench mark
Given the number of Albion fans who might have the Albion as a second team that shouldn't be a surprise![]()
That was pretty poor. We really do lack a midfielder with bite at the moment. Someone really should have kicked Forestieri into the stands.Thought we were ok at best.
Kuszczak - 5 - bit flappy
Bruno - 6 - lucky to stay on
Greer - 5 - over the line or not, why did he not swing his left at it?
Upson - 6
Ward - 7
JFC - 4 - disappointing, lost all his personal battles in first half
Andrews - 4 - if you are going to pull out of challenges, go back to Bolton!
Crofts - 6
Conway - 5 - used his left foot............ Once. Not good enough
Buckley - 8 - looked dangerous
Barnes - 6 - better when he replaced Conway
Surely you mark every player whether they are playing a Premiership or Championship game starting at a 5 as average for what you have come to expect in that standard and then + or - for their performance during the game. Are you suggesting that a higher number than 5 should be considered the average?
No I'm suggesting that marking anyone with a 5 or less last night is a travesty and they are possibly influenced by how good a Premier League player is when giving their marks.
I give up. You are either choosing to save face and not admit you're wrong. Or you're stupid.
Or football isn't so black and white, and I just have a different opinion.
No I'm suggesting that marking anyone with a 5 or less last night is a travesty and they are possibly influenced by how good a Premier League player is when giving their marks.