Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Boston Marathon + all other related incidents UPDATED



AZ Gull

@SeagullsAcademy Threads: @bhafcacademy
Oct 14, 2003
11,886
Chandler, AZ
yeah, thats exactly what i'd do if i were a government agency planning a bombing, have identifiable units around being seen and filmed. alongside the known paraplegic veteran with fake injuries, noone is going to spot them. its not like there are hundreds of crackpots out there trawling over footage and images to catch it out or anything. i'm convinced by this new information, theres no possible explaination for a couple of vets being at Patriots day, it absolutly proves the government, CIA, FBI, ATF, DEA, and DEFJAM are in on this op.

Are you suggesting our ex-beloved scouser Craig is some sort of great debunker of US Government conspiracies? :ohmy:

I have to say, his clownish "I-once-worked-on-Steven-Gerrard's-roof" foil is brilliant, if so.
 




dingodan

New member
Feb 16, 2011
10,080
CBSNews: FBI now acknowledges they interviewed Tsarnaev 2 years ago at request of a foreign country about possible extremist ties
 


RexCathedra

Aurea Mediocritas
Jan 14, 2005
3,503
Vacationland
Anyone else laugh when they heard Obama say that "Boston refused to be terrorised"? Absolutely - locking down an entire city is a completely rational, non-hysterical reaction.

It's to keep the police from shooting up civilians, or themselves. The LAPD did themselves no favors when they were hunting Chris Dorner.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
60,020
The Fatherland
It's to keep the police from shooting up civilians, or themselves. The LAPD did themselves no favors when they were hunting Chris Dorner.

The contrast between the US response and the UK response in these situations is quite different. I guess the US can argue they got their guy.
 


Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,887
West west west Sussex
but on a lighter side:-

[video]https://vines.s3.amazonaws.com/v/videos/B22419A1-9294-4C9E-B3D7-ACFA333F3FE1-11079-0000065C1C76562F_1.0.6.mp4?ver sionId=eb_jud3eW17frHkRyCb1Rts Gby1nokNw[/video]
 






Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,887
West west west Sussex
That's brilliant.
I love the nonchalant way he walks off.

In the old days a few people in the office would laugh at him, now he'll have half the planet taking the p***.

Good old 21st century.
 


Dec 29, 2011
8,037
BBC News - Boston bombs: Officials wait to question Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

"In a move criticised by rights activists, officials have said they intend to question the teenager without reading him his Miranda rights - the standard statement informing suspects they have a right to a lawyer and to remain silent - citing a "public safety exception"."

What does this mean for the lad? Surely withholding the right to remain silent could lead to 'torture', make them speak by any means necessary. Also doesn't this kind of imply they think he's guilty before a trial?
Everyone should be entitled to the same legal treatment no matter what they're SUSPECTED of doing. America is the most hypocritical country out there.
 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,169
If there was a man on the run last seen in Mile Oak, even a man on the run with explosives and guns, would it be appropriate to have armoured vehicles moving through every street in Brighton and Hove? "Troops" going door to door, room to room of every house?

That would not be egregious?

It's amazing what fear will do to people.

So what are you suggesting is 'really' happening?
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,169
My question is this.

Why do we only have one of these conspiracy theorist at a time?

We had Brunswick/Rosa who then passed the baton on to The Truth (who I am sure is still about, but not on this thread...... which is weird as I would have thought it was right up his alley) and now we have this new chap.

Why are they not all on the same threads as their ideas are very similar and they could surely back each other up?

It should also be pointed out that their posting styles are also very similar?

I smell conspiracy from the conspiracy theorists.
 


The Truth

Banned
Sep 11, 2008
3,754
None of your buisness
My question is this.

Why do we only have one of these conspiracy theorist at a time?

We had Brunswick/Rosa who then passed the baton on to The Truth (who I am sure is still about, but not on this thread...... which is weird as I would have thought it was right up his alley) and now we have this new chap.

Why are they not all on the same threads as their ideas are very similar and they could surely back each other up?

It should also be pointed out that their posting styles are also very similar?

I smell conspiracy from the conspiracy theorists.

Amazing! We've been experiencing American media pushing for more gun control over it's own people for the last however months and now Boston has its very own version of Bin Ladin. You must believe a lot of shit to believe this crap!
 




The Truth

Banned
Sep 11, 2008
3,754
None of your buisness
If there was a man on the run last seen in Mile Oak, even a man on the run with explosives and guns, would it be appropriate to have armoured vehicles moving through every street in Brighton and Hove? "Troops" going door to door, room to room of every house?

That would not be egregious?

It's amazing what fear will do to people.

So what are you suggesting is 'really' happening?

75 years ago, you'd probably been saying the same thing.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,169


Only 2/3 of the way through this video but so far, despite the presenter telling us he has done lots of research, there is not one single shred of evidence to back up anything he is saying.
 


The Truth

Banned
Sep 11, 2008
3,754
None of your buisness




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,169


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,169
BBC News - Boston bombs: Officials wait to question Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

"In a move criticised by rights activists, officials have said they intend to question the teenager without reading him his Miranda rights - the standard statement informing suspects they have a right to a lawyer and to remain silent - citing a "public safety exception"."

What does this mean for the lad? Surely withholding the right to remain silent could lead to 'torture', make them speak by any means necessary. Also doesn't this kind of imply they think he's guilty before a trial?
Everyone should be entitled to the same legal treatment no matter what they're SUSPECTED of doing. America is the most hypocritical country out there.

worrying to say the least
 








Nibble

New member
Jan 3, 2007
19,238
It's an absolute joy to see another CT thread. I wonder, if when this lot grow up and start to make some cohesive sense of the world and begin to operate within it in a productive, positive way, thus making an improvement to the world as oppose to wallowing in self congratulatory, self indulgent, paranoid, negativity will they still bother to post on here? I hope so, it would be nice to see them make the step.
 


Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,921
Brighton
BBC News - Boston bombs: Officials wait to question Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

"In a move criticised by rights activists, officials have said they intend to question the teenager without reading him his Miranda rights - the standard statement informing suspects they have a right to a lawyer and to remain silent - citing a "public safety exception"."

What does this mean for the lad? Surely withholding the right to remain silent could lead to 'torture', make them speak by any means necessary. Also doesn't this kind of imply they think he's guilty before a trial?
Everyone should be entitled to the same legal treatment no matter what they're SUSPECTED of doing. America is the most hypocritical country out there.

7 Police Myths Everyone Believes (Thanks to Movies) | Cracked.com

All it means is they can't use what he says in a court of law. I'm sure they have enough evidence to get a conviction, but questioning him without reading his rights meaning it not being used in the courts might encourage him to answer more freely than if he thinks he might incriminate himself.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here