The People's (Media's) Choice

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Roy Hodgson or Harry Redknapp?

  • Roy Hodgson

    Votes: 125 90.6%
  • Harry Redknapp

    Votes: 13 9.4%

  • Total voters
    138


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,465
2 hours in, 44 votes and 95% in favour of Roy. im a little surprised its that much (im sure Rednakpp is popular), but proves without a doubt that the "people" haven't necessarily been consulted by the tabloid sports editors. (and they been rumbled by the non-tabloid for some time who ahve been advocating Roy and other alternatives.)
 






SK1NT

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2003
8,770
Thames Ditton
Roy all the way..

Redknaps needs millions and still underachieves in my opinion...
 


TheJasperCo

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2012
4,612
Exeter
Roy is a gentleman, and I prefer him to Harry as a person, but in terms of managerial ability, I've gone for Redknapp. I just think that, even though the media are being unduly harsh on poor old Woy, this decision was made by the FA because a) Redknapp cost too much money, and b) he said no, no, no.

I'm worried that this will end up like one "Wally with a Brolly" era. What the England team needs is stability - a long-serving manager who can progress the squad forwards. I doubt Hodgson will be able to step up to the plate. Good luck to him, and call me cynical, but I'm just fearing the worst.
 


Durlston

Heavy XTC user
Jul 15, 2009
10,220
I wish to apologise for my earlier post about Harry Redknapp. It was a foolish thing to put on a public forum and I bitterly regret the comments I made about the Tottenham manager. Sorry to him and the moderators who run NSC.
 






D

Deleted member 2719

Guest
I am also sick and tired of hearing all the media bullshit, i always wanted Martin O'neil or Roy so i am very happy with the appointment, i just hope the media keep off his back.
 


bennibenj

Well-known member
Mar 6, 2011
2,071
Sompting
But Harry has won the Intertoto Cup and the (equivalent of the) Johnstone's Paint Trophy, people.

Luckily he's not a man to blow his own trumpet, for sure, and he thinks it's triffic that Roy has got the job and he never thought about putting himself forward for a second.

God, I bet he's absolutely GUTTED, given how hard his Sun buddies worked to get him the job :lolol:

Exactly, well said
 




Dec 19, 2011
268
Hove
Although all the media were saying "Harry is the fans choice", I spoke to remakably few people who echoed this.

Having thought about it a bit more, I think the FA have done exactly the right thing, in the right way ...... for once.

Roy was the right choice in the end but they should have approached him quicker and not let the selection proccess drag out for so long, in the meantime speculation about Redknapp grew to the point where lots of the players have come out in support of him which means Hodgson starts on the back foot.
 


Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,888
West west west Sussex
I wish to apologise for my earlier post about Harry Redknapp. It was a foolish thing to put on a public forum and I bitterly regret the comments I made about the Tottenham manager. Sorry to him and the moderators who run NSC.
You f***ing liar :lol:
 






Lush

Mods' Pet
With weeks to go, and motivation of senior players being about all we can hope for as no time to build anything, I think Harry would get us a lot further in Euro 2012.

Hodgson is the only sensible candidate for the future though.
 


Garry Nelson's Left Foot

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
13,836
tokyo
With weeks to go, and motivation of senior players being about all we can hope for as no time to build anything, I think Harry would get us a lot further in Euro 2012.

Hodgson is the only sensible candidate for the future though.

It's hard to disagree with this. Redknapp would have been a good choice if we were only looking at 2012. Luckily the F.A were looking longer term. Hodgson is the better choice for a longer term project. He's not my first choice but if the candidate has to be English then he is the pick of the bunch.

Hdgson has a track record of making his teams cohesive and hard to beat, he gets the most out of average players and has a wide and successful knowledge of European and World football. With him in charge I'm hopeful that the England team will evolve and the new players coming in, lacking the big name status and ego's of their predecessors, will be forged into a coherent team capable of giving anyone a decent game and restoring some pride into our national team.

I just hope the media lay off him, the way they've reacted so far has been very disappointing.
 


Redknapp's record is mediocre at best, with some highlights!

I've always been banging on about Hodgson, how is that we have one of the most respected coaches in Europe and we (The English) can see how good he is!

Liverpool should of held on to him, if anyone cares to remember that J.W Henry didn't buy Liverpool till October after the transfer window. So the poor bugger was left with a pittance to improve a mediocre squad. Could you imagine if he had the same money that the miserable Jock had to spunk up the wall...
 




Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
20,285
Out of those two Hodgson is undoubtedly the better choice. However, rather peversely, part of me wanted them to give it to Redknapp simply to lance the boil. No matter what happens they'll be people who will say "Huh, Harry would have done better" in much the same way as they are people who are convinced that England would have won every tournament going in the 70s and 80s if only the FA had appointed Brian Clough.

As Capello (and Don Revie) demonstrated - being a successful club manager does not automatically mean you'll be a successful international manager. The FA are right to point out that in terms of previous international experience Hodgson is the best candidate England have ever had. We've tried the 'best club manager' approach (Capello, Revie), we've tried the 'people's choice' approach (Keegan), and we've tried the 'sophisticated foreigner' approach (Sven), so the 'previous experience' approach is at least a refreshing break from the past.
 


Poyetry In Motion

Pooetry Motions
Feb 26, 2009
3,556
6.61 miles from the Amex
Roy.
Oh, how I'll laugh when he unexpectedly wins the Euros. Wankers like The Sun will change their tune rather rapidly
 


Pantani

Il Pirata
Dec 3, 2008
5,446
Newcastle
Did anyone listen to 5 Live last night? Ian McGarry was being a right twat. He basically spat his dummy out because his bum chum Harry did not get the job. He came out with every reason he could think of why Roy should not get the job.

'Roy's training is boring'
'Roy gets tetchy with the press sometimes'
'Roy has never won anything'
'Roy won't have the respect of the players'
'Roy hates puppies'
'Roy steals candy from babies'

Finally he tried to defend the Sun front page by likening it to people taking the piss out of Capello not being able to speak english! McGarry you are a complete idiot.
 


withdeanwombat

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2005
8,783
Somersetshire
My choice would have been either a 25 year contract for Stuart Pearce or some foreign bloke who doesn't speak English but has won his equivalent of the Isthmian league.
 




Kumquat

New member
Mar 2, 2009
4,459
Redknapp for me every time. The England football team are a f***ing circus and he would have been the right ringleader. Would have made it a lot more interesting.
 


B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
'arry! :)
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top