Disgusting Racist Attck

[Tyrone Biggums]

Because personally I would have no issue with hitting women in this situation, I'd beat the shit out of them. Am I alone in that?

I agree with you.

If 4 women set upon my partner I'd come out swinging big time.

Added if one or two of them ended up with broken jaws then stiff shit, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.

 

[Common as Mook]

I agree with you.

If 4 women set upon my partner I'd come out swinging big time.

Added if one or two of them ended up with broken jaws then stiff shit, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.

You might lose sleep when your getting buggered by a big aborigine in Woolamaloo nick.

 

[DTES]

I don't understand how this makes any difference at all. If someone is racially abused, are they then allowed to attack the abuser until they are kicking them in the head whilst they're unconcious?

Nope, of course they're not. The attack was disgusting.

I guess - in addition to my instinctive distrust of the Mail (only enhanced by McCullan last week, but that's a separate issue) - if they were racially abused themselves then while this is a disgusting attack, it isn't a "racist" one, in that it wasn't because the victim was white. In case I get accused of being an apologist here (not necessarily by you, Commander), I'll repeat that it's a disgusting attack.

I just don't like the Mail's spin (on everything really) and I don't like the "if it was the other way round" comments that seem pretty baseless.

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

You might lose sleep when your getting buggered by a big aborigine in Woolamaloo nick.

The only aborigines around here stab each other to death.

True story, happened just last Saturday.

 

[TWOCHOICEStom]

Nope, of course they're not. The attack was disgusting.

I guess - in addition to my instinctive distrust of the Mail (only enhanced by McCullan last week, but that's a separate issue) - if they were racially abused themselves then while this is a disgusting attack, it isn't a "racist" one, in that it wasn't because the victim was white. In case I get accused of being an apologist here (not necessarily by you, Commander), I'll repeat that it's a disgusting attack.

I just don't like the Mail's spin (on everything really) and I don't like the "if it was the other way round" comments that seem pretty baseless.

Fair point. I think the thing is that no matter what actually happened beforehand, 4 people beating the living shit out of one defenceless girl whilst she's on the floor is wrong and it's very surprising that they haven't gone to prison.

 

[BigGully]

White, pink, yellow or brown; this is a disgusting racial attack. No need to bring any other permutations into it and it should be taken for exactly what is.

Dont be bloody daft, the reason this seems so outrageous is just that.

 

[Pavilionaire]

I cannot see the judge giving suspended sentences to a gang of white girls kicking the shit out of a Muslim girl, booze or no booze.

This verdict will only make racism worse as the perception grows that these Somalian Muslims get special treatment from the State.

 

[pasty]

I don't understand how this makes any difference at all. If someone is racially abused, are they then allowed to attack the abuser until they are kicking them in the head whilst they're unconcious?

I'm sure the Mail are spinning this a bit to please their readers, but there isn't an excuse for attacking someone like that (unless they were eating cupcakes in Hampstead of course).

Absolutely this. I care not whether the motivation for the attack was alcohol fuelled, racist or any other reason. Nor do I care what race the perpetrators were. For an attack like that, they should be in jail. END OF.

 

[Pavilionaire]

What makes this case worse is that the whole thing was caught on CCTV, and every kick in the head was filmed. Unbelievable!

 

[BigGully]

Absolutely this. I care not whether the motivation for the attack was alcohol fuelled, racist or any other reason. Nor do I care what race the perpetrators were. For an attack like that, they should be in jail. END OF.

But the law does care if it is a racially motivated attack.

The sentences would be harsher and in this instance it seems that due to the ethnicity of the group the judge has done the direct opposite.

Its a strange quirk by some that have this inverted racial bias.

 

[Aseros]

What did the boyfriend do to these girls? as surely he couldn't claim self-defence, and therefore would have gone on trial too?

 

[Goldstone Rapper]

A vicious, disgusting attack.

Interesting, the number of questions about what the sentence would have been if the attack had been white-on-black.
Also interesting is whether the story would have made the Daily Mail, and then reposted on NSC, if it had been white-on-black.

 

[keaton]

But the law does care if it is a racially motivated attack.

The sentences would be harsher and in this instance it seems that due to the ethnicity of the group the judge has done the direct opposite.

Its a strange quirk by some that have this inverted racial bias.

Where's the evidence of the "inverted racial bias"?

 

[User removed 4]

Nope, of course they're not. The attack was disgusting.

I guess - in addition to my instinctive distrust of the Mail (only enhanced by McCullan last week, but that's a separate issue) - if they were racially abused themselves then while this is a disgusting attack, it isn't a "racist" one, in that it wasn't because the victim was white. In case I get accused of being an apologist here (not necessarily by you, Commander), I'll repeat that it's a disgusting attack.

I just don't like the Mail's spin (on everything really) and I don't like the "if it was the other way round" comments that seem pretty baseless.

To be honest I’m incredulous at some of the replies to this, It was a racist attack, what part of “ kill the white slag “ isn’t racist ? Why were they not charged with racially aggravated assault , is anyone SERIOUSLY suggesting they wouldn’t have been had the girl been muslim and the five assailants white ? As for the accusations that the boyfriend originally racially abused them, well to quote Mandy Rice- Davies “ they would say that wouldn’t they “ , would you give the same credence to this had the situation been reversed ? I somehow just can’t imagine you attempting to mitigate the incident by espousing innuendo about one of a group of five white girls viciously attacking a muslim because one of them claimed she was called a white bitch.

 

[piersa]

Forgetting the Muslim bit for a second as no doubt people are going to get wound up by it, if 4 girls attacked your girlfriend and you were there at the time, how far would you go to defend her? Would you just try and block / pull them off her, or would you actually throw punches?

Because personally I would have no issue with hitting women in this situation, I'd beat the shit out of them. Am I alone in that?

I hear what you are saying but the mail is a sensationalist pile of steaming poo.

 

[User removed 4]

From what I've read in the Leicester Mercury there are allegations that the boyfriend was the one making the racial abuse ..........

Probably no witnesses to verify it though.

Why comment on it then? It's obviously pure conjecture.

 

[Triggaaar]

if 4 girls attacked your girlfriend and you were there at the time, how far would you go to defend her? Would you just try and block / pull them off her, or would you actually throw punches?

Because personally I would have no issue with hitting women in this situation, I'd beat the shit out of them. Am I alone in that?

I'd be throwing everything I had, starting with headbutts.

 

[El Presidente]

Why comment on it then? It's obviously pure conjecture.

Gratuitous picture of Konnie Huq just for you bushy

 

[H2O]

I will leave the race questions to others as it really does get tedious but what i cant work out is when did a claim of my clients weren't used to drinking alcohol become a suitable defence and it would seem one that actually worked!

 

[User removed 4]

Gratuitous picture of Konnie Huq just for you bushy

You'll get me in trouble at work EP!!