By far and away, his best game for England.Do you not remember Lennon absolutely TERRIFYING the Croatia defence in the 2nd qualifying match against them?
By far and away, his best game for England.Do you not remember Lennon absolutely TERRIFYING the Croatia defence in the 2nd qualifying match against them?
Do you not remember Lennon absolutely TERRIFYING the Croatia defence in the 2nd qualifying match against them?
I wouldn't say Walcott had much skill, if he did he'd be a lot better than he is now, he just seems to run into the defender in front of him half the time. He is SO reliant on that pace, and nothing else, very little skill, very little intelligence of movement (I'm starting to think that hat trick against Croatia was a bit of a fluke) - he doesn't seem to have developed as a player at all since he was 16.Walcott: superb skill, blinding pace, but no delivery, no awareness of other players or indecision. might get better, but just seems to lack football brain. also lightwieght and stays down when nudged.
Lennon: superb skill, blinging pace, awareness of players and improving delivery
i wouldnt even take Walcott, though he will be going as 5th stiker (where his raw talent will make up for deficencies).
Walcott always seems a bit like a headless chicken to me, nowhere near enough end product for the pace he has.
Both lack an end product
Thats a myth that gets over used. 10 assists and 3 goals in 22 league games isnt a bad return for someone with no end product.
I assume you are talking about Lennon. So to go with this, on Monday, someone in the pub I was in said in 09/10, for England, Lennon had 3 or 4 assists in 5 games. Which also isn't bad.