User removed 4
New member
yes YOU....... from ME. You really are a twit.
yes YOU....... from ME. You really are a twit.
yes YOU.
Have my horlicks ! *cough* *giggle* *splutter* pure comedy genius !I guess the irony of your previous response is lost on you. Now go and have your Horlicks, it is past your bed time.
Think where your taxes go on ALL the Royals.
Diana may have been a beneficiary, but it seems to me she was working for good causes. For that reason, I begrudge her her wages far less than the nob-end she married.
I do not have much time for Charles generally but to give the impression that Diana did more for charity than he did/does is frankly ridiculous. His charitable causes are less photogenic but he seems to be more concerned with the environment, which at the end of the day will cause more death than aids and land mines put together of nothing is done.
So in conclusion, sighting any royals charity work as a reason why they are good person is bollocks they all do far more than the average person because they do not have to work and it is expected by the general public. They are effectively keeping their end of the bargain, we pay for their homes and lifestyle they give a higher profile to various charitable causes.
Bushy although I have sympathy for your point of view on this one you are barking
If not for self-promotion, why then did she invite tabloid editors to lunch?
EFAI'm Quite a cock actually.
But she didn't start out as a Royal, or ask to be used as a beard by one.
Once in, she could have milked it - she had no obligation towards anyone and wasn't raised in Buckingham palace.
She chose to take up causes, and prince twat of wales can have his secretary do his charity for him while combining it with a nice safari.
What has El Presidente done to have you blame ME for a post that HE wrote?
Always the same unfounded smears without ever answering the real questions, but that's probably because you know your answers don't bear any real scrutiny.You should know Lord B that as Bushy thinks all immigrants are the same then that rule also applies to Mods.![]()
I agree , disgraceful behaviour, fancy being out with her boyfriend on the lash, especially when her estranged, long suffering husband had behaved so blamelessly.The fact of the matter is, if she wasn't sniffing around with Dodi instead of being at home with her family, she would still be here today...
Always the same unfounded smears without ever answering the real questions, but that's probably because you know your answers don't bear any real scrutiny.
And?My original quote was from that bastion of the establishment Private Eye.
And?