[News] Nigel Farage and Reform

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊









TomandJerry

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2013
12,876
You mean the sorts of fair trials that have previously resulted in miscarriages of justice?
In all cases the jury was beyond reasonable doubt that the person committed the crime.

Which is why I'm saying that shouldn't the be standard, with DNA testing these days and CCTV you could build a case against someone where it's indefensible
 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
19,994
It wouldn't be appropriate to prejudge a trial before a verdict has been returned by a jury through a fair trial
One of those fair trials where we have stripped people of their human rights?

You would need huge faith in the judical system (which it appears many Reform voters do not have) and the government overseeing it (which anyone with any sense surely doesn't have).

I don't get the benefits.
 




TomandJerry

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2013
12,876
One of those fair trials where we have stripped people of their human rights?

You would need huge faith in the judical system (which it appears many Reform voters do not have) and the government overseeing it (which anyone with any sense surely doesn't have).

I don't get the benefits.
Well of course, but what about the human rights of the victims of the crime? Does the prepentator consider such things while committing the crime?
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
19,210
Gods country fortnightly
The second thing Reform will do is remove the NHS to a lucrative insurance system. Insurances that put premiums up at every opportunity, that find clauses not to cover a particular ailment, and will be very profitable for the insurance companies.
Reform might say, it will be like Germany or France's insurance based health system but you can bet your house on it soon becoming more and more like America.
Reform are the party of posh boys in favour of de-regulation to reward their mates.

It really ain’t that complicated.
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
22,932
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Well of course, but what about the human rights of the victims of the crime? Does the prepentator consider such things while committing the crime?
The point is that we as a society are supposed to be better than them.
 




Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
16,756
Cumbria
In all cases the jury was beyond reasonable doubt that the person committed the crime.

Which is why I'm saying that shouldn't the be standard, with DNA testing these days and CCTV you could build a case against someone where it's indefensible
They're likely to be pretty rare though. Look at cases such as Letby, where the arguments are still going on.

And, what would be the main benefit of the death penalty in your view?
 


TomandJerry

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2013
12,876
They're likely to be pretty rare though. Look at cases such as Letby, where the arguments are still going on.

And, what would be the main benefit of the death penalty in your view?
And if the death penalty was introduced it should only ever be used in such rare cases, that's my point.

Anyone guilty of committing a crime of such severity to warrant such punishment should not be allowed the luxury of having 3 meals a day, the possibility of attacking prison guards over and over.

The example I linked just now, the guy is locked in an isolated cell watched by 5 guards and a dog 24/7.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
16,756
Cumbria
And if the death penalty was introduced it should only ever be used in such rare cases, that's my point.

Anyone guilty of committing a crime of such severity to warrant such punishment should not be allowed the luxury of having 3 meals a day, the possibility of attacking prison guards over and over.

The example I linked just now, the guy is locked in an isolated cell watched by 5 guards and a dog 24/7.
So you see it as a cost-saving measure?
 






Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Well of course, but what about the human rights of the victims of the crime? Does the prepentator consider such things while committing the crime?
You’re probably not old enough to remember the death penalty.

It should never have any place in civilised society.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Perhaps that's one angle, another is an eye for an eye, some people might feel more at peace once due process has been carried
If we ever had an eye for an eye, the whole world would end up blind.
 






BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
19,994
Well of course, but what about the human rights of the victims of the crime? Does the prepentator consider such things while committing the crime?
What about if the victims do not want the death penalty for the perpetrator? Are you suggesting we take that into account too?

I struggle to see the benefits of the death penalty, why do you want it?
 


TomandJerry

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2013
12,876
What about if the victims do not want the death penalty for the perpetrator? Are you suggesting we take that into account too?

I struggle to see the benefits of the death penalty, why do you want it?
Then the prosecution should not be chasing a death penalty sentence, instead a whole life order.

Because clearly, as the case above shows that particular person won't ever be let out of isolation due to his original crimes and continuing crimes against prison officials, what's the arguement to keep him going?
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top