[Politics] Donald Trump, US President

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Who will win the 2024 Presidential Election?

  • President Joe Biden - Democrat

    Votes: 3 0.7%
  • Donald Trump - Republican

    Votes: 175 42.3%
  • Vice President, Kamala Harris - Democrat

    Votes: 216 52.2%
  • Other Democratic candidate tbc

    Votes: 20 4.8%

  • Total voters
    414
  • Poll closed .






raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
9,511
Wiltshire
I thought anything this buffoon said would no longer surprise me, but it has. This will alienate his pal, Putin.

View attachment 201027
What a shame Trump didn't bother to meet the bodies of the four US military returned home after their tragic deaths during NATO training exercises in Baltics (?) - he chose golf instead.
 


fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
2,296
in a house


Fignon's Ponytail

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2012
4,790
On the Beach
But they only joined in, in WWI at the last knockings for the final push.
But they did have a major effect for that final year....as they did in WW2, which we are all thankful for tbh.
It seems to be a recurring theme with the US....stay out of it until something happens to involve them, then come in all guns blazing.


The way Trump has worded that just sits very uncomfortably with me though....will raise a few hackles for sure.
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2016
27,183
West is BEST
And largely wouldn't have touched WW2 were it not for Pearl Harbour.

It’s more nuanced than that but basically it was Germany that declared war on the U.S a few days after the U.S. declared war on the Japanese.


Don’t get me wrong, the US had a huge part in winning the war. Upsetting that Trump has weaponised the brave work and sacrifices of American soldiers.
 
Last edited:




Albion my Albion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 6, 2016
21,321
Indiana, USA
But they only joined in, in WWI at the last knockings for the final push.

That was mainly due to the US being isolationist. UNTIL Woodrow Wilson took up a leadership role and started the failed League of Nations. The reason for the need for the US to take up the leadership role was the failed leadership in Europe and the reason for the failed League of Nations was the vindictiveness of the European leaders towards Germany. Also the stroke Wilson suffered in his second term.
 


fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
2,296
in a house
But they did have a major effect for that final year....as they did in WW2, which we are all thankful for tbh.
It seems to be a recurring theme with the US....stay out of it until something happens to involve them, then come in all guns blazing.


The way Trump has worded that just sits very uncomfortably with me though....will raise a few hackles for sure.
I am aware the US contribution in WWI was a very important factor in the final win but the way the Yanks go on about it anyone would think they did it all on their own and we were losing. They also bang on about how they paid for it all.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
But they did have a major effect for that final year....as they did in WW2, which we are all thankful for tbh.
It seems to be a recurring theme with the US....stay out of it until something happens to involve them, then come in all guns blazing.


The way Trump has worded that just sits very uncomfortably with me though....will raise a few hackles for sure.
Russia lost more men than the rest of the Allies put together. Putin will be furious with Trump's vain boasts.
 




fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
2,296
in a house
Russia lost more men than the rest of the Allies put together. Putin will be furious with Trump's vain boasts.
Russia under Stalin & Putin don't give a shit about Russian lives. Stalin killed almost as many Russians as the Germans.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Russia under Stalin & Putin don't give a shit about Russian lives. Stalin killed almost as many Russians as the Germans.
Oh, I am aware, but the Russians do take pride in their military achievements.
 


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
8,332
That was mainly due to the US being isolationist. UNTIL Woodrow Wilson took up a leadership role and started the failed League of Nations.
I would say it was actually Pearl Harbour that fundamentally changed America’s stance on WWII. Until then, it was Europe’s problem.

Same way before 9/11, America’s involvement in foreign wars was largely in South America and to a lesser extent SE Asia - Post 9/11, Bush’s War on Terror began a whole new era of political and military intervention in the ME.

Same way now, the war in Ukraine is regarded by Trump as a European problem.

Does anyone else see pattern here?

The American psyche is ‘isolationist’ until it affects Americans personally - that was why the war in Vietnam was so unpopular when body bags in the thousands started being shipped home - American lives being lost for what?
 




Sea Cider

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2012
685
And largely wouldn't have touched WW2 were it not for Pearl Harbour.

It’s more nuanced than that but basically it was Germany that declared war on the U.S a few days after the U.S. declared war on the

Don’t get me wrong, the US had a huge part in winning the war. Upsetting that Trump has weaponised the brave work and sacrifices of American soldiers.
Please don't use racial slurs on here. Suggest you edit your post
 
Last edited:


Albion my Albion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 6, 2016
21,321
Indiana, USA
I would say it was actually Pearl Harbour that fundamentally changed America’s stance on WWII. Until then, it was Europe’s problem.

Same way before 9/11, America’s involvement in foreign wars was largely in South America and to a lesser extent SE Asia - Post 9/11, Bush’s War on Terror began a whole new era of political and military intervention in the ME.

Same way now, the war in Ukraine is regarded by Trump as a European problem.

Does anyone else see pattern here?

The American psyche is ‘isolationist’ until it affects Americans personally - that was why the war in Vietnam was so unpopular when body bags in the thousands started being shipped home - American lives being lost for what?

Okay, but Woodrow Wilson and the League of Nations was about the Great War (WWI) and the failed leadership in Europe. It was a failed attempt by Wilson due to Americans wanting to stay isolationist. If the US hadn't expanded into the Pacific there would have been no need for the Japanese to Attack Pearl Harbor (no "u"). Americans would have never got involved in Europe without failed leadership among European leaders.
 






hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
63,244
Chandlers Ford
I thought anything this buffoon said would no longer surprise me, but it has. This will alienate his pal, Putin.

View attachment 201027

God, he makes me sick.

But they only joined in, in WWI at the last knockings for the final push.

I literally thought until this post that nothing Trump could do anymore could surprise me, but this has somehow managed it. He has swung so far into parody he must have put a whole generation of comedians out of work :(
To be honest, I'm surprised at this announcement - only insofar that he hasn't personally 'decided to rename' it US Victory Day
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
8,332
Last edited:


Albion my Albion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 6, 2016
21,321
Indiana, USA

(Click on MSN)

Mike Pence Calls for Donald Trump Reversal—'Warning Signs Are Flashing'​


Former Vice President Mike Pence urged President Donald Trump to reverse course on the sweeping tariffs he announced in April.

In an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, Pence wrote that "economic warning signs are flashing" as he criticized Trump's tariffs as a "massive policy misstep."



Pence was terrible for Indiana but his calls against Trump are just what the US needs.
 






peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
13,073
Oh, I am aware, but the Russians do take pride in their military achievements.
They do.

But as with much in their society, much is based on lies and historical revisionism.

You wont find truthful references inside Russia of the Soviets actions, prior to 1941, their partnership with Nazi Germany, their part in the invasion of Poland.

For much of the brainwashed masses the war only started in 1941 with Op Barbarosa when Hitler attacked. You'll find no mention of US lend lease, or absolutely crucial intel passed by British having cracked enigma.

They won the war alone.

Lovely footage from the May 1941 red square March, then it was celebrating the glorious 1917 revolution, now its Russias victory of Nazis in the great 1941-1945 war ..... And this just weeks before The Germans betrayed them and attacked. (of course in Russia this is fake news)

Spot the Nazis (30 secs and loads from 3:40)

 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top