[Politics] Russia invades Ukraine (24/02/2022)

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊









sully

Dunscouting
Jul 7, 2003
7,974
Worthing
There’s a lot in that post.

It’s fine I understand you are comfortable with the U.K. relying on other countries industry to support its defence strategy. That position for me is sub optimal, as neatly demonstrated by the recent election of Trump.

If this country’s defence strategy is tied to other countries industrial output we are significantly less independent in our own ability to produce armaments and exports themto allies. That may be the only viable option for the British Government today, however it equally means we are a diminished global power.

Reliance on other countries industries and resources to support our defence will also mean that we will have to pay more.

And there’s the ultimate point, I am comfortable that this country steps back from global politics, our finances are shot, we have a limited industrial base to be at the top table and beyond the nuclear warheads we have a feeble conventional military.

Ukraine has demonstrated beyond measure that the Russian military machine has limitations, however the war continues and Russia still occupies 20% of Ukraine.

The one point we can agree on, is the likelihood of European conquest by Russia. For different reasons, not going to happen, this country’s politicians should recognise that and have a debate with the country on what type of defense strategy we can afford going forward.
Can you name a country that is wholly independent in its defence?
I don’t know why you keep banging the same drum apart from having nothing else to contribute.
 










Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
8,576
An update on your previous thoughts @Eric the meek

First, this is the original article about the blood feud. It dates back to October, so this is just for background and context. It is possible it isn't relevant to the latest events.


More recently, on 24 March, Solovyov was reported as forced to apologise on film to a Kadyrov associate. If we bypass the detail of the original outburst, and the subsequent apology, this episode first illustrates Kadyrov's power, but also suggests that control by the Kremlin of Solovyov and maybe the other propagandists, is becoming at least blurred. The messaging is confused. Taking it a step further, it is possible some kind of power struggle is going on.


Power struggles are mentioned in this Meduza report from March 27. Chechens are subject to a “strict order from the top” barring Chechen leaders and security officials from engaging in such conflicts or drawing public attention in general. Which inadvertently confirms there are power struggles going on.


So it seems there is division in the Kremlin, and we are seeing just the signs at the surface.

(Sorry for the long post on matchday).
 


fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
2,285
in a house
First, this is the original article about the blood feud. It dates back to October, so this is just for background and context. It is possible it isn't relevant to the latest events.


More recently, on 24 March, Solovyov was reported as forced to apologise on film to a Kadyrov associate. If we bypass the detail of the original outburst, and the subsequent apology, this episode first illustrates Kadyrov's power, but also suggests that control by the Kremlin of Solovyov and maybe the other propagandists, is becoming at least blurred. The messaging is confused. Taking it a step further, it is possible some kind of power struggle is going on.


Power struggles are mentioned in this Meduza report from March 27. Chechens are subject to a “strict order from the top” barring Chechen leaders and security officials from engaging in such conflicts or drawing public attention in general. Which inadvertently confirms there are power struggles going on.


So it seems there is division in the Kremlin, and we are seeing just the signs at the surface.

(Sorry for the long post on matchday).
That's OK, I'll save it for Monday, if that's OK. Mother's Day tomorrow so a bit busy.
 






Sirnormangall

Well-known member
Sep 21, 2017
3,488
First, this is the original article about the blood feud. It dates back to October, so this is just for background and context. It is possible it isn't relevant to the latest events.


More recently, on 24 March, Solovyov was reported as forced to apologise on film to a Kadyrov associate. If we bypass the detail of the original outburst, and the subsequent apology, this episode first illustrates Kadyrov's power, but also suggests that control by the Kremlin of Solovyov and maybe the other propagandists, is becoming at least blurred. The messaging is confused. Taking it a step further, it is possible some kind of power struggle is going on.


Power struggles are mentioned in this Meduza report from March 27. Chechens are subject to a “strict order from the top” barring Chechen leaders and security officials from engaging in such conflicts or drawing public attention in general. Which inadvertently confirms there are power struggles going on.


So it seems there is division in the Kremlin, and we are seeing just the signs at the surface.

(Sorry for the long post on matchday).
Good to see something else to occupy Putin at this time. Russia hasn’t found it easy to keep a lid on Chechnya and if Kadyrov goes there will likely be more trouble in Putin’s backyard
 


raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
9,471
Wiltshire
First, this is the original article about the blood feud. It dates back to October, so this is just for background and context. It is possible it isn't relevant to the latest events.


More recently, on 24 March, Solovyov was reported as forced to apologise on film to a Kadyrov associate. If we bypass the detail of the original outburst, and the subsequent apology, this episode first illustrates Kadyrov's power, but also suggests that control by the Kremlin of Solovyov and maybe the other propagandists, is becoming at least blurred. The messaging is confused. Taking it a step further, it is possible some kind of power struggle is going on.


Power struggles are mentioned in this Meduza report from March 27. Chechens are subject to a “strict order from the top” barring Chechen leaders and security officials from engaging in such conflicts or drawing public attention in general. Which inadvertently confirms there are power struggles going on.


So it seems there is division in the Kremlin, and we are seeing just the signs at the surface.

(Sorry for the long post on matchday).
Interesting thanks 👍, and I was unaware of the forced apology from Solovyov.
As you say, a lot going on.
 








hampshirebrightonboy

Well-known member
Sep 3, 2011
1,087
There’s a lot in that post.

It’s fine I understand you are comfortable with the U.K. relying on other countries industry to support its defence strategy. That position for me is sub optimal, as neatly demonstrated by the recent election of Trump.

If this country’s defence strategy is tied to other countries industrial output we are significantly less independent in our own ability to produce armaments and exports themto allies. That may be the only viable option for the British Government today, however it equally means we are a diminished global power.

Reliance on other countries industries and resources to support our defence will also mean that we will have to pay more.

And there’s the ultimate point, I am comfortable that this country steps back from global politics, our finances are shot, we have a limited industrial base to be at the top table and beyond the nuclear warheads we have a feeble conventional military.

Ukraine has demonstrated beyond measure that the Russian military machine has limitations, however the war continues and Russia still occupies 20% of Ukraine.

The one point we can agree on, is the likelihood of European conquest by Russia. For different reasons, not going to happen, this country’s politicians should recognise that and have a debate with the country on what type of defense strategy we can afford going forward.
You seem to have some sort of strange Russian based agenda. Not sure exactly what you’re trying to achieve but as I’ve previously said you’re pissing in the wind on here. You’re not going to influence anyone. We are too clued up for that. So stop wasting everyone’s time and f*ck off
 
Last edited:














Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
8,576
I know the Trump administration struggles to admit when they’re wrong but surely even Trump will run out of patience with this moron
Maybe, but Trump appointed him. On a separate note, Vance wants Waltz to take the rap for Signalgate, (for which to be fair, he has accepted responsibility).

There's more to come from this shower. Their disadvantage isn't just their policies; it's also their insufferable arrogance.
 


Sirnormangall

Well-known member
Sep 21, 2017
3,488
Maybe, but Trump appointed him. On a separate note, Vance wants Waltz to take the rap for Signalgate, (for which to be fair, he has accepted responsibility).

There's more to come from this shower. Their disadvantage isn't just their policies; it's also their insufferable arrogance.
You’d think that Putin and chums must be having a good old laugh at the arrogance and amateurism of the Trump administration - but they must also wonder if they’re part of a huge US con trick
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top