Very useful - thanks. You're pointing me to these I assume?I'm not your mum, look it up yourself.
![]()
Very useful - thanks. You're pointing me to these I assume?I'm not your mum, look it up yourself.
![]()
Or maybe you mean this?I'm not your mum, look it up yourself.
![]()
Edited for accuracy!It's a shame that the funding Stonewall got has been cut (USAid was not half their income as your post gives the impression). Most was used for advocacy work abroad. As in trying to support gay people who get the crap beaten out of them in Eastern Europe for just being gay.
Do you think?
They have a way of identifying what someone does on their home computer after driving past specific billboard ads in their car. From memory, it was related to location tracking of users signed into a Yandex app (which most Russians are). Reference to it here. For marketers, this is holy grail territory but the likes of Google have refused to do it, with good reason.In what way?
What is it with these posters who refuse to answer simple questions – to the point where they will follow up with multiple posts to drag the chat away from the original question – and yet they expect people to answer THEIR questions?
![]()
Russian propaganda is clumsy and easy to see through, I dont use it for news and a link to the BBC is just that . They also don't collect information for the authorities or I wont be getting the KGB knocking on my door IOW.Just out of interest, why did you post a link to Yandex? It's not the normal 'go to' search engine for anyone who isn't Russian or promoting their world view?![]()
David Icke and to leftwing journals? Yea well done.
Oh I know this one. It's because they are unyielding bellends.What is it with these posters who refuse to answer simple questions – to the point where they will follow up with multiple posts to drag the chat away from the original question – and yet they expect people to answer THEIR questions?
![]()
What actual fraud has he exposed to date please?
Is this the sort of thing you meant? And presumably agree with?I'm not your mum, look it up yourself.
![]()
Is this the sort of thing you meant? And presumably agree with?
That's a fabulously weaselly way of brushing over his fuckups.Last thing I saw Musk say was that some mistakes happen and when found rectified.
What better way to have faith restored in a government, when you're told that mistakes have been made when they didn't need to be? If only they had, y'know, done it properly in the first place.That's a fabulously weaselly way of brushing over his fuckups.
Thats a snide way of saying you don't understand the issue. If you understand anything about trafficking it requires boots on the ground not "academics at Yale". Looks like a con job, the story has no traction beyond dodgy looking outlets and not even the Guardian will not touch it.That's a fabulously weaselly way of brushing over his fuckups.
Out of interest, how did you obtain your special understanding of trafficking, greater than my own...?Thats a snide way of saying you don't understand the issue. If you understand anything about trafficking it requires boots on the ground not "academics at Yale". Looks like a con job, the story has no traction beyond dodgy looking outlets and not even the Guardian will not touch it.
Well there is the resent hit Film Sound of freedom.Out of interest, how did you obtain your special understanding of trafficking, greater than my own...?
Because you can't spell basic words?Well there is the resent hit Film Sound of freedom.
Or CIA handbook,
Trafficking in persons - The World Factbook
www.cia.gov
Why do you assume you are better informed than people you disagree with?
So, you've watched a film and read something on the internet? That's your understanding of trafficking?Well there is the resent hit Film Sound of freedom.
Or CIA handbook,
Trafficking in persons - The World Factbook
www.cia.gov
Why do you assume you are better informed than people you disagree with?