rogersix
Well-known member
- Jan 18, 2014
- 7,905
no, he has to exhaust every avenue of bullshit first
oh dear, another false equivalence, a tad desperate
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Sir Keir Starmer apologises for 'administrative errors'
- Thread starter Is it PotG?
- Start date
no, he has to exhaust every avenue of bullshit first
oh dear, another false equivalence, a tad desperate
I think he has done both
It's a good thing that he's hit a nerve. If he'd had widespread acquiescence it would have been embarrassing.
Apparently you're taking the thread far too seriously. Apparently it is a mischievous thread.
My, how we all laughed.
Medwayseagull
JCB
No luck so far with my thumbs up.
It is part of his ironic pose and an attempt to hide the fragility of his values......
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
- Thread starter
- #86
https://news.sky.com/story/sir-keir-starmer-breached-mps-code-of-conduct-eight-times-12665831
The leader of the Opposition failed to register on time eight interests, including Premier League box seats and the sale of a plot of land.
An inquiry into the Labour leader was opened in June by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Stone, relating to claims about late declaration of earnings and gifts, benefits or hospitality from UK sources.
These included a directors' box for two people at Crystal Palace worth £720, four tickets for Watford vs Arsenal and tickets for his staff for the British Kebab awards.
Speaking at the time, Sir Keir said he was "absolutely confident" he had not broken the MPs' code of conduct.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 70,401
Good to see that going to watch Crystal Palace constitutes a breach of parliamentary standards 
pb21
Well-known member
- Apr 23, 2010
- 6,347
Quite.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
I am assuming the missed bit was also "inadvert" and that there was "no deliberate attempt to mislead" by the poster either
Last edited:
KZNSeagull
Well-known member
The most important bit of vital interest to the country has also been omitted. Who won the British Kebab awards?
Non story. You deliberately omitted where the story says they were minor, inadvertent and with no attempt to mislead.
You do yourself no favours with your twisting of the truth.
Britain.
dadams2k11
ID10T Error
Wow, you can't handle that your man Bojo, as been found out for being a lying corrupt oath, and now you are making your self look silly, even mentally unstable, buy looking for stuff to post about Sir Kier.
Maybe go and speak to someone. My PM's are open if you need a chat?
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
- Aug 24, 2020
- 5,396
'Interesting article', usually means it's interesting for you, and tedious reading for the rest of us, while you eagerly await responses.
Deadly Danson
Well-known member
First paragraph enough to convince me that it's written by a moron. No point reading on.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,335
about as interesting and uninspiring as Starmer. which is both a weakness and strength electorally, people are probably ready for a bit of dull governance.
rogersix
Well-known member
- Jan 18, 2014
- 7,905
- Oct 12, 2022
- 1,901
I’m afraid, that like others here, I can spot a gammon baiting article when it’s put in front of me. I got no farther than the end of paragraph one.
It’s all the Conservative Party have left, trying to keep their voters angry about trans people. A very small percentage of the population who are largely (with the exception of a few noisy activists and their hangers-on) trying to make it through their lives like the rest of us.
Don’t look at the bin fires of our global standing, our health system, our education system, our emergency services or our food security. Don’t look at the fact that your kids can’t afford homes to live in, don’t look at how we have never fined a company more as a fine than it made In profits by breaking the law (effectively taking a cut) and just stay angry about people who (often feeling they’ve been born into the wrong gender) have quite a lot on their plate already.
The Telegraph of old was a decent newspaper, what’s been served up there is bilge of the lowest quality and an offence against journalism. If you have actually paid for access, frankly I’d ask for my money back.