Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
The official Corona virus C**T list
- Thread starter Simster
- Start date
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
Anyone who shakes hands with David Icke and calls him 'the great man' must be a right ****. Who'd do a thing like that? Oh.............
Had a quick look at Icke's twitter account, blimey there's people that believe him and loads in fact. Very worrying
Spuds have reversed their decision to furlough non playing staff.
Too late to rectify their reputation?
Too late to rectify their reputation?
Christ.
This takes me back to when a paediatrician in Portsmouth had a brick thrown through her window back in the 90s
I live in Kent. On the rare occasion that we've had travellers on a green (impossible, now, owing to deeply embedded rocks at the edge of most greenspace) the local chavs have take the opportunity to go on a burgulary binge in the expectation this would be blamed on the travellers.
yxee
Well-known member
It kind of makes sense given he's quite important in the government right now.
"Why did Michael Gove get and transmit coronavirus to the other half of the cabinet?"
"Because we refused to test someone in his household with symptoms out of principle"
It's the same reason Boris got tested I imagine. Because we can't afford to have more interruptions in government.
Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Christ.
This takes me back to when a paediatrician in Portsmouth had a brick thrown through her window back in the 90s
Indeed, by an intelligent chav lady leading a lynch mob on an estate believing the person was a paedophile
I live in Kent. On the rare occasion that we've had travellers on a green (impossible, now, owing to deeply embedded rocks at the edge of most greenspace) the local chavs have take the opportunity to go on a burgulary binge in the expectation this would be blamed on the travellers.
Scum blaming scum
Only difference is one lot live in caravans and the others in flats and houses.
Completely agree. But even I didn't think he was this bad.
This has to be the end of his career apart from appearing with Alex Jones or Icke in their mentalist shows.
What an utter ****.
Scum blaming scum
Only difference is one lot live in caravans and the others in flats and houses.
Different type of scum, though. One makes a fair mess in a public park as part of their outmoded lifestyle and culture, and the other robs from their own, hoping it will be blamed on the outsiders. I know which I'd punch harder, given the opportunity, and a formal exemption from prosecution.
Eamonn Holmes, reckons he has an enquiring journalistic mind
Channel surfing today I came across that tw*t on This Morning, immediately moving on. Can’t stand the bloke, a presenter for the lowest common denominator. Stealing a living
Yup, definitely gone. The telecom business is mighty. And I agree, **** him. I'm with Children's Health Defense on this one.
"Thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies link wireless technology, including 5G, to a grim inventory of deadly and dangerous injuries. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) does not find sound scientific evidence to support the hypothesis that 5G is the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that the spread of this hypothesis provides a strategic advantage to Big Telecom and Big Data. Allowing these companies to focus the debate on COVID-19 has given them pretext to censor discussion of 5G and to shift the debate to a battlefield where the science is hypothetical and weak. We therefore urge health advocates to focus discussion on proven harms.
There is ample pervasive human evidence of 5G and wireless harms. CHD’s work, including our historic lawsuit against the FCC for its false and obsolete health guidelines, is a potent threat to the wireless industry and its fraud on the public. CHD will continue to share the evidence and truth about 5G and wireless harms."
Hopefully you were never exposed to analogue TVs then.
Do these studies tell us why 3G or 4G is safe but 5G is not?
Aren’t CHD anti-vaxxers anyway? Add them to the list too
Motogull
Todd Warrior
- Sep 16, 2005
- 10,027
Oh yes please. The fat smug empty headed kunnt.
The studies tell us that 3G and 4G is bad and 5G is worse.
I dont know their stance on vaccines and dont really give a shit either since its not the subject, My own stance in that question is "could be good, could be bad - it depends".
Why’s it bad? What’s the difference? And do you actually understand or does it just read good to you?
All of it - is just using radio waves already all around us. In many countries 5G is just using the spectrum that analogue tv preciously did. Was that dangerous?
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,471
worse for what? as noted some system use previously used frequncies, and some systems use the same band as wifi. should be copius amounts of evidence of something.
Its bad because its been proven over and over and over again that electromagnetic radition is harmful. There's thousands and thousands of studies that prove it, and one or two studies, funded by the telecom business and endlessly repeated in the debate, that says "there is no proof of it being dangerous". As for the exact technical aspects, I'm no expert, but others are.
In what countries would that be?
Cool story Mr Icke.