Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] The General Election Thread

How are you voting?

  • Conservative and Unionist Party

    Votes: 176 32.3%
  • Labour Party

    Votes: 146 26.8%
  • Liberal Democrat’s

    Votes: 139 25.5%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 44 8.1%
  • Independent Candidate

    Votes: 4 0.7%
  • Monster Raving Looney Party

    Votes: 7 1.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 29 5.3%

  • Total voters
    545
  • Poll closed .






wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,644
Melbourne
I'm just pointing out that the board's resident right wing numpty is a friendless saddo who can't even grasp the irony that the politicians he champions will have him out on the streets within a year of taking power. Still, it must be worth it just to be able to not hear foreign accents on the bus anymore.

But have they not had 10 years to do that already?

Maybe you are wildly wide of the mark?
 


Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,023
hassocks
FBB9A45D-00D6-45C6-A1CB-65A5D94F684E.png

Lol. Imagine trusting Farage.

Hilarious stuff
 




Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
34,579
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
So, for a thicko like me, should Brexit happen then there is a blanket ban on immigration...from Europe or anywhere else?

Well that obviously depends on who wins the election that this entire thread is about :facepalm:

If Corbyn wins I would expect freedom of movement to continue and potentially be extended as per the conference agreement, though this needs to be ratified under Clause V.

If Swinson wins we're revoking A50 so the status quo stands.

If Johnson wins it'll likely be a points based system with no free movement. Much less welcoming and easy for foreigners to come here yet he doesn't seem prepared to set an actual target. How unlike him.

And if Farage wins? Well, Farage can't win because he's bottled it twice, once personally and once removing 317 of his nutjobs from the battle. But there are rumours - strong rumours - of a deal between him and Johnson for a harder Brexit which will inevitably crack down on immigration.

I believe that's the version our resident fairy is in favour of, and if you don't believe that you're in a minority of one.

No need to consider yourself a thicko though. Five minutes a day on the BBC website should cover off all the above and more :thumbsup:
 




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
26,108
Just like 31st March, 12th April and 31st October our 'No deal' friends get shafted once again, and still can't figure out who's responsible ?

V0erD1Ly_400x400.jpg

:lolol::lolol::lolol:

And, as a bit of advice, I'd be getting those Amazon lubricant orders in before the Xmas rush and practice touching your toes ready for the 31st Jan

image.jpg

:wink:
 
Last edited:


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
26,108
im wondering how he expected to be reimbursed anyway.

Well it could be that Farage has made a principled stand and withdrawn the candidates because, as he says, Johnson has guaranteed no extension to the 'implementation' period past 31/12/2020 (a bit like he guaranteed we would leave on 31st October)

Or

It could be that the money that was funding the whole Farage campaign is pulling the strings (and the funding/reimbursements etc)

Now personally, I can't imagine which it may be :wink:
 


Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
34,579
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
But have they not had 10 years to do that already?

Maybe you are wildly wide of the mark?

No. No they haven't. Five years of it was a coalition with the Lib Dems who reigned in most of their nutjobbery but had to suck up agreeing to tutor fees in Uni. The subsequent four has been spent talking about Brexit to the detriment of every other subject whilst not actually achieving anything. Hope that helps.
 




highflyer

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2016
2,445
Hillary is always a reliable and trustworthy source of truth and common sense.

Aye. She's not wrong as it happens, but she shares the Blair delusion that her intervention will make things better. In reality it just reinforces the opinion of those that think the whole Brexit push is 'anti-establishment' and undermines the arguments that Trump shouldn't be intervening with his rancid opinions.
 








Mellor 3 Ward 4

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2004
9,860
saaf of the water
Like Lewes MP Maria Caulfield supporting Brexit when her constituency was 52% Remain, you mean?


Whatever your opinion on Brexit, you're on very thin ice when it comes to MPs representing their constituents on the subject.

You could point to Yvette Cooper who campaigns actively for remain in her seat which voted by a 69.3% – 30.7% margin to Leave the EU

By constituency, 406 voted Leave 242 Remain - so how many did not honour the wishes of their constituents?
 


Frutos

.
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
May 3, 2006
35,675
Northumberland
Whatever your opinion on Brexit, you're on very thin ice when it comes to MPs representing their constituents on the subject.

You could point to Yvette Cooper who campaigns actively for remain in her seat which voted by a 69.3% – 30.7% margin to Leave the EU

By constituency, 406 voted Leave 242 Remain - so how many did not honour the wishes of their constituents?
I was simply replying to Ppf's post.

Of course it cuts both ways.
 


Grombleton

Surrounded by <div>s
Dec 31, 2011
7,356
Apart from that stupid comment it makes you wonder why we vote when some of our MP's disrespect their constituents,Obviously people like HKFC and yourself are happy with that type of democracy
Reap what you sow
Regards
DG

If it upsets you as much as it seems to, then it can only be good for our society.
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
18,296
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Wait, so Brexit Party candidates are cross because Nigel Farage promised them something which would improve their lives, but when it came to it it's ended up making them worse and costing them a fortune?

*Looks down camera*
 




Bob!

Coffee Buyer
Jul 5, 2003
11,187
Electoral Calculus today (same as yesterday afternoon possibly).

View attachment 117047

Current Polling Compared to This Time in the 2017 Campaign:

CON: 38.5% (-8.6)
LAB: 28.4% (-0.1)
LDM: 15.9% (+6.5)
BXP: 8.9% (+2.5)*
GRN: 3.7% (+0.7)

[tweet]1193984074764967941[/tweet]
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
18,296
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Electoral Calculus today (same as yesterday afternoon possibly).

View attachment 117047

Got to love an electoral system where a party can poll a lower percentage of votes to previously and gain a load of seats as a result.
 




Greavsey

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2007
1,144
I wonder if Corbyn will fall on his sword after the election if he returns numbers like the calculus suggests or will he continue to hang around?

He has to surely, and that is potentially the only remotely positive think that might come out of this election. Unless the idiots in the Labour party don't learn from this and nominate another un-electable leader...
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
55,907
Back in Sussex
Current Polling Compared to This Time in the 2017 Campaign:

CON: 38.5% (-8.6)
LAB: 28.4% (-0.1)
LDM: 15.9% (+6.5)
BXP: 8.9% (+2.5)*
GRN: 3.7% (+0.7)

[tweet]1193984074764967941[/tweet]

The bad news for Labour is they're 4-0 down after 10 minutes.

The good news for Labour is they have 80 minutes to turn things round.

The bad news for Labour is they're not up against the worst public-facing PM in memory, running the worst campaign ever. For all his numerous and obvious flaws, Boris knows how to get elected as his multiple mayoral successes in London, broadly a Labour city, illustrate.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here