I know this post isn't aimed at me but I did look at the incident with an open mind and concluded that the Audi needed at least two panels put through.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Road rage video. Which side are you on - Team Bike or Team car?
- Thread starter Billy the Fish
- Start date
I know this post isn't aimed at me but I did look at the incident with an open mind and concluded that the Audi needed at least two panels put through.
I cannot believe the vote. The man in the car infringed the bike lane with his c*ck extension, the bloke rightly got pissed off probably because this was the 10th time it happened that day and he almost died several times with ars*hole drivers, he had a word and got physically attacked. But people vote team, Car. Only on NSC
Cannot believe it or cannot accept it?
I do and I am old fashioned
Padders
New member
No excuse for violence.
Yeah we have road rules. Do cyclists stick by them 100%?
Your up your own lycra ASS if you think so!
Phat Baz 68
Get a ****ing life mate !
- Apr 16, 2011
- 5,023
Car driver is a complete and utter **** and was in the wrong in the first place thinks he owns the ****ing road sad little prick
Recently I was travelling East along the coast in Worthing. There is a bus terminal near Worthing pier. I approached the 'one way' street next to the bus station. A bus was parked on the main thoroughfare legally against the curb. I continued to head to pass it within the normal parameters of the rights of way and the road layout. Out of nowhere a cyclist in lycra came out the one way street which runs 'South to North' (ie exiting illegally) and onto the main road, swerving between myself and the parked bus! I managed to react but I had limited movement because of oncoming traffic. Of course I bridled.... I was mad, I could have hit him with a one tonne beast and then have been made to look a ***** in the local media. Car hits Bike, Driver automatically bad driver! Never mind the truth. Cyclists JUST DON'T think of this do they?......
care to comment?
I don't do Lycra as it gives me a rash.
God I can't cope with all the 'conclusions' on here.
First and foremost, the driver doesn't hit anyone, it's the rear passenger.
Just because the cycle zone is there it doesn't have to be used.
The selfish cyclist obviously felt intimidated by the car.
As he should, the car can easily kill him.
With that in mind why go out of your way to antagonize the car drivers of London.
Mr Selfish Cyclist arrives at the junction on 11 seconds.
The lights change on 28 seconds, (sure he wasn't to know that, but I believe a quick change is not uncommon for lights in London).
So that's 17 seconds Mr S Cyclist had to wait.
He was not overcrowded on his bike.
He had plenty of room 2 abreast, to stop and wait.
Should a further 5-10 other cyclists arrived they too would have had room in the zone to cycle away safely.
[MENTION=566]Bad Ash[/MENTION] makes a very good analogy involving filter lanes, and etiquette.
A foul mouthed tirade doesn't justify a punch in the face.
But a punch in the face is a more likely conclusion to a foul mouthed tirade.
First and foremost, the driver doesn't hit anyone, it's the rear passenger.
Just because the cycle zone is there it doesn't have to be used.
The selfish cyclist obviously felt intimidated by the car.
As he should, the car can easily kill him.
With that in mind why go out of your way to antagonize the car drivers of London.
Mr Selfish Cyclist arrives at the junction on 11 seconds.
The lights change on 28 seconds, (sure he wasn't to know that, but I believe a quick change is not uncommon for lights in London).
So that's 17 seconds Mr S Cyclist had to wait.
He was not overcrowded on his bike.
He had plenty of room 2 abreast, to stop and wait.
Should a further 5-10 other cyclists arrived they too would have had room in the zone to cycle away safely.
[MENTION=566]Bad Ash[/MENTION] makes a very good analogy involving filter lanes, and etiquette.
A foul mouthed tirade doesn't justify a punch in the face.
But a punch in the face is a more likely conclusion to a foul mouthed tirade.
Last edited:
1 question Baz.
Why did the cyclist pull in font of the car?
Both think they own the road.
Phat Baz 68
Get a ****ing life mate !
- Apr 16, 2011
- 5,023
If it was his fault the cyclist then he in that instance is the ****ing idiot !!
Phat Baz 68
Get a ****ing life mate !
- Apr 16, 2011
- 5,023
In the first instance that box was clearly for cyclists only right or wrong ?
So that's what started the problem the car should not have been in the cyclists area, it had no right legally to be there !
Can't see how it's the cyclists fault don't get me wrong I've seen some cyclists do some insane things but I have to be honest I've seen far more car drivers do mental things
Cheeky Monkey
Well-known member
- Jul 17, 2003
- 23,162
It's bad enough with bikers sitting in cycle boxes at traffic lights. The amount of times I've arrived in a cycle box (or whatever the terminology is) at a traffic light to find a car or bike stopped in it. They are designed to reduce conflict between cyclists and motorised traffic, not for motorised traffic to use them to claim pole position, or to encroach on them at all, unless they have been caught out by a light turning orange and have decided not to cross.
What I find amazing is that more than half of the people on the poll voted in favour of the idiot who physically assaulted someone over the idiot who shouted verbal abuse.
Sorry I meant before the cyclist turn up, the Audi bumper was over the cycle area, but the car was not in it, I'm not sure why the cycle had to be in front of the car and not with the other cycles.
You talk sense.
The vote and majority of comments backing the Audi driver was very predictable. Far more people drive, and many think of other road users as the enemy .... especially the growing band of bike riders. The funny thing is that there is no bond between car/taxi/bus drivers on the road - just continuing road rage, illegal driving behaviour, frustration and aggression.
Billy the Fish
Technocrat
- Thread starter
- #157
That is a good point. It's more a case of etiquette rather than the rules.
It shoud be a natural instinct for any road user to stick left unless they are turning right. It's a bit like morotway drivers who pull straight into the middle lane when they're not overtaking, the law says they're allowed to do it but it's not right. Cutting straght into the middle like that was the beginning of a dick-waving contest!
Keep trying, we have seen cyclists do as much. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Ok question to you, why was THAT cyclist in that position in the box?
I accept the car driver makes an incorrect decision after that cyclist turns up, the other cyclists at the start if the video are happy to keep left, I'm missing the point here.
No you are not missing the point you are nailing it. The self righteous dick on the push bike thinks he is empowered and so it ends in tragedy and as yet, no formal complaint to the police. Says it all.