Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Right then. After that demonstration... VAR? Yes or No?

VAR


  • Total voters
    444


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
12,368
Cumbria

That does actually look a little more offside than Burn's - they seem to have taken it from his armpit, when his shoulder was further forward.

Capture.JPG
 




pb21

Well-known member
Apr 23, 2010
6,437
It’s pretty simple

It’s meant to be clear and obvious

Clear and obvious means you are looking at the picture without any lines and a time limit

If you can’t see it within 30 seconds without assistance it’s not clear and obvious.

I would say no lines and 5 seconds, otherwise the on field call stays.
 






Stephen Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2015
454
Barcelona
That does actually look a little more offside than Burn's - they seem to have taken it from his armpit, when his shoulder was further forward.

View attachment 118655

Can someone who knows how to enlarge that picture? Bit tough to see it on the phone
 






KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
20,088
Wolsingham, County Durham
If you are going to use VAR for offsides, then I would change the rule to say that in order to be offside the attacker must have no part of his body in line with a defender (ie clearly ahead), not any part of his body ahead.
 


Deadly Danson

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2003
4,134
Brighton
Again, we are trusting these buffoons to make decisions based on technology that isn't accurate. Today's ref clearly didn't even have the ability to stop and start his watch - 3 mins injury time with a good couple of mins VAR, the odd injury, time wasting and six subs. Luckily it made no difference to us but if these morons cant even do this properly then there's no chance with VAR.
 




The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,383
Sorry but if you’re having to slow down video freeze it and give someone offside by a toenail then the advantage should go with the attacking team, blatant errors like the Luiz one are what VAR is for, it’s just not the football I love anymore when we are sitting here dissecting images like this, it’s an absolute disgrace.

Absolutely not fit for purpose anymore.
 




Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
30,836
People are paying big money for tickets, away fans giving up their whole day and not even getting shown a replay. Piss poor.
 




The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,383
People are paying big money for tickets, away fans giving up their whole day and not even getting shown a replay. Piss poor.

Strange thing is they had started showing the VAR decision replay on the big screen, then today with the Burn call they showed nothing. Convenient, its utterly horrendous.

We were talking about this today as well, the linos are told to not put the flags up for tight calls, what happens if the linesman doesn’t put his flag up, you win a corner from the offside attack so you’ve gained an advantage by being offside, then score from the corner?

There is just so many nonsense vagaries and rules that aren’t fit for VAR, along with the people running it. Utter buffoons.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
12,368
Cumbria
Strange thing is they had started showing the VAR decision replay on the big screen, then today with the Burn call they showed nothing. Convenient, its utterly horrendous.

We were talking about this today as well, the linos are told to not put the flags up for tight calls, what happens if the linesman doesn’t put his flag up, you win a corner from the offside attack so you’ve gained an advantage by being offside, then score from the corner?

There is just so many nonsense vagaries and rules that aren’t fit for VAR, along with the people running it. Utter buffoons.

Could have happened when Murray won the corner when he was clearly offside.
 






Hamilton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
12,646
Brighton
It's not VAR, it's the way it's used; the rules; and the officials.

I like the idea employed in tennis where players get a set number of challenges.

Also, it simple has to be put own the screen and we need to hear what the officials are saying to each other, so mic them all up.

It's not hard, it's just football is so way behind in its adoption of technology.
 




dangull

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2013
5,127
I would just add that it takes so long for a decision to be made that it allows a tiring defence to recover some what, so that is another reason for less goals in a game.
That's a big reason most of us turn up for games.
 
Last edited:


father_and_son

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2012
4,646
Under the Police Box
It's not VAR, it's the way it's used; the rules; and the officials.

I like the idea employed in tennis where players get a set number of challenges.

Also, it simple has to be put own the screen and we need to hear what the officials are saying to each other, so mic them all up.

It's not hard, it's just football is so way behind in its adoption of technology.

Or have a time limit. If VAR cannot be 100% sure within 30seconds then it is "inconclusive" and the benefit of the doubt goes to the attacking side.
If it should be "clear and obvious" then it shouldn't take long to establish there is an error.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here