Poyet to Sunderland

[B.W.]

are you pissed or just stupid you quoted yourself....

Oops! Meant to edit my earlier response to WS. Ah well.

 

[B.W.]

Abusing someone for having a different opinion? I didn't see any insults from the Large One.

Really. Apparently what I say has no value, I'm prejudiced, etc., etc.

 

[piersa]

They are welcome to him. The bloke is an A1 narcissist. A horrible stale bucket of weewee.

 

[B.W.]

No, clarification means reasserting, using alternative language, the same argument. You have changed from "moving on" to "not moving on" - that's back peddling.

Clarification is what it is. 'To make clear or easier to understand' 'To clear of confusion or uncertainty'.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Really. Apparently what I say has no value, I'm prejudiced, etc., etc.

That is about your opinions, not personal abuse such as you posted.

 

[glasfryn]

Really. Apparently what I say has no value, I'm prejudiced, etc., etc.

it is especially when its second hand from some no mark at the club without a backbone who gets you to do the dirty

 

[B.W.]

That is about your opinions, not personal abuse such as you posted.

I think not.

 

[B.W.]

it is especially when its second hand from some no mark at the club without a backbone who gets you to do the dirty

'No mark'! Hilarious. Keep on deluding yourself.

 

[The Wizard]

Down to 1/2 in the bookies, nearest rival 7/1. Meh good luck to him not a bad job I suppose.

 

[Icy Gull]

it is especially when its second hand from some no mark at the club without a backbone who gets you to do the dirty

Interesting, so you know who BW's contact is?

BW is getting an absolute hammering on here at the moment, somewhat unfairly imo. He reckons he knows something but has not given us an inkling as to what it may be, except to state that it puts Gus in the wrong. He may be right, he may be wrong but what a ****ing witch hunt from others with absolutely no clue as to what he has heard.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

'No mark'! Hilarious. Keep on deluding yourself.

to mislead the mind or judgment of : deceive, trick

Delusion is when you know something to be a fact but ignore it in a similar way to denial, pretending that it isn't a fact or trying to deceive. Seeing as we haven't been told yet what is fact and what isn't we can't be deluded.

 

[The Wizard]

Jesus read these comments about Poyet from Sunderland fans

http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/poyet-interview-tomorrow.814840/

I find the jokes about turds rather comical

 

[glasfryn]

Interesting, so you know who BW's contact is?

could be anyone ...but is obviously got it in for Poyet
and no I don't know who it is and if I did I would tell you .....................whoever it is still a "no mark"

edit.....do you honestly think he actually know anyone at the club then?

 

[Acker79]

Not always, but repeatedly, and without justification, yes.

You have repeatedly questioned the club's lack of signing a striker. We are currently averaging 2 points per game have Barnes, can use ward, buckley, conway or barker in an emergency, will have ulloa back in four days time, suggesting there is no need to sign a striker, so it can quite easily be argued your repeated questioning of the club without justification makes you disloyal.

But I'm sure you would argue you are justified. Maybe you are, I'm in no position to judge you, because justification for a given position can be subjective.

 

[Rugrat]

Still don't see this happening at all ... he'll hold on for better/nearer/less volatile

 

[Icy Gull]

edit.....do you honestly think he actually know anyone at the club then?

He'd be the most delusional person who ever posted on here if he didn't, so yes I think he might. Would a no mark be privy to such sensitive information? This is a football forum I don't understand why people are getting so wound up with BW. No need to respond if you think he's full of BS is there?

 

[Westdene Seagull]

could be anyone ...but is obviously got it in for Poyet
and no I don't know who it is and if I did I would tell you .....................whoever it is still a "no mark"

edit.....do you honestly think he actually know anyone at the club then?

I don't care if he knows someone or not - he contradicts himself constantly which makes him utterly unbelievable.

 

[Acker79]

Interesting, so you know who BW's contact is?

BW is getting an absolute hammering on here at the moment, somewhat unfairly imo. He reckons he knows something but has not given us an inkling as to what it may be, except to state that it puts Gus in the wrong. He may be right, he may be wrong but what a ****ing witch hunt from others with absolutely no clue as to what he has heard.

I think he's giving as good as he gets.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

He be the most delusional person who ever posted on here if he didn't, so yes I think he might. Would a no mark be privy to such sensitive information? This is a football forum I don't understand why people are getting so wound up with BW. No need to respond if you think he's full of BS is there?

What sensitive information? He's never given out any information but very spiteful nasty comments about Poyet. I accept the club probably had good reason to sack him, but the bile and venom that BW comes out with, you'd think that Poyet has personally burgled every director's house, and sold their children into slavery.

 

[WATFORD zero]

I can't believe this is still going.

Never, in the history of NSC has so much, with so little meaning, been posted by so few

For that reason, I'm OUT