In all seriousness, this is classic bully behaviour. And that’s all Trump ultimately is, a bully picking on those he deems lesser than him. And he attracts bullies who feel emboldened to also bully others they deem somehow lesser.
In all seriousness, this is classic bully behaviour. And that’s all Trump ultimately is, a bully picking on those he deems lesser than him. And he attracts bullies who feel emboldened to also bully others they deem somehow lesser.
His behaviour when surrounded by sycophants and his “crew” vs his behaviour when faced with genuine authority. All bullies are full of it until they realise someone has some genuine authority over them.What is? I must be missing your point because I am not sure how your comment about bulling relates to me posting a couple of comparative images as meme on Trump’s courtroom behaviour, inside and outside.
It was just meant to be funny and light hearted (not meant to invoke either a crude response or serious one!)
I would love to hear your views on Project 25, the ‘Conservative Promise’ that Trump intends to implement should he be elected.So is claimed, but why would he do that? What I heard he said he needed more time to go through the boxes for them.
I don’t need a Wiki summary, I’m going to read all 920 PAGES and get back to you first thing in the morning…I would love to hear your views on Project 25, the ‘Conservative Promise’ that Trump intends to implement should he be elected.
Wiki summarises it as
Edit: Citing an anonymous source, The Washington Post reported Project 2025 includes immediately invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy the military for domestic law enforcement and directing the DOJ to pursue Trump adversaries.
- Crack down on abortion nationwide
- Add a census question about citizenship and reapportion electoral votes based on number of citizens, not number of people
- Roll back environmental regulations and drill for more oil and gas in the arctic
- Simplify the tax code and lower the corporate tax rate and then make it harder for congress to change that tax system
- Give the president direct control of the entire executive branch, including the DOJ, and then direct the DOJ to pursue legal action against Trump’s adversaries
- Rescind regulations prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, etc for the department of health and human services
- Deputize the national guard in red states to intern in camps and subsequently deport undocumented immigrants and then have those guardsmen invade blue states to do the same thing
- Outlaw pornography (but really, they mean outlaw teaching kids that it’s okay to be LGBTQ)
- Fire all federal employees who are insufficiently loyal to Trump and replace them with vetted stooges
- Eliminate or drastically defund numerous federal agencies including but not limited to the FBI, EPA and USAID
Or as one Reddit user put it…
This “project” is nothing less than a professionally framed playbook for a coup to usurp our current democracy and replace it entirely with an autocratic Evangelical Fascist regime!”
Please provide something that shows this.So is claimed, but why would he do that? What I heard he said he needed more time to go through the boxes for them.
I got through about 40 pages then speed read through about another 40 and then gave up - I really did need the Wiki summaryI don’t need a Wiki summary, I’m going to read all 920 PAGES and get back to you first thing in the morning…
I posted this link above - apparently the excuse Trump gave to the Feds was he had to get his shoes and ‘pants’ out of the boxes before he handed them over to the Feds - don’t ask!Please provide something that shows this.
Thanks
Phew, got through it in a couple of hours. A quick summary…I would love to hear your views on Project 25, the ‘Conservative Promise’ that Trump intends to implement should he be elected.
Wiki summarises it as
Edit: Citing an anonymous source, The Washington Post reported Project 2025 includes immediately invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy the military for domestic law enforcement and directing the DOJ to pursue Trump adversaries.
- Crack down on abortion nationwide
- Add a census question about citizenship and reapportion electoral votes based on number of citizens, not number of people
- Roll back environmental regulations and drill for more oil and gas in the arctic
- Simplify the tax code and lower the corporate tax rate and then make it harder for congress to change that tax system
- Give the president direct control of the entire executive branch, including the DOJ, and then direct the DOJ to pursue legal action against Trump’s adversaries
- Rescind regulations prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, etc for the department of health and human services
- Deputize the national guard in red states to intern in camps and subsequently deport undocumented immigrants and then have those guardsmen invade blue states to do the same thing
- Outlaw pornography (but really, they mean outlaw teaching kids that it’s okay to be LGBTQ)
- Fire all federal employees who are insufficiently loyal to Trump and replace them with vetted stooges
- Eliminate or drastically defund numerous federal agencies including but not limited to the FBI, EPA and USAID
Or as one Reddit user put it…
This “project” is nothing less than a professionally framed playbook for a coup to usurp our current democracy and replace it entirely with an autocratic Evangelical Fascist regime!”
Phew, got through it in a couple of hours. A quick summary…
1. Trump can’t crack down on this, it’s a state issue. As an aside, I believe abortion is abhorrent.
2. Excellent idea. Non citizens should have no influence on electoral votes.
3. Excellent idea. The war on fossil fuels is destroying our economy.
4. Excellent idea.
5. Unconstitutional, although it hasn’t stopped the DOJ pursuing legal action against Biden‘s adversaries.
6. Excellent idea, meritocracy rules.
7. invade blue states? Again, a state issue.
8.
9. Utterly ridiculous.
10. Excellent idea.
I can’t think of a well more thought out analysis than yours…
Page references and para nos please. (and any relevant footnotes you may have referred to) - one can’t possibly respond to such a well thought out analysis without reference to the original source material
Keep it up Zeb, this would be far much less a forum without you.I can’t think of a well more thought out analysis than yours…
Hmm, let me think, would I prefer a weaker economy with no fossil fuels yet a habtiable planet for all or would I rather we destroyed the planet and only the very rich nations survive ( if they're lucky ) ? Difficult one I'll accept.3. Excellent idea. The war on fossil fuels is destroying our economy.
This demonstrates well that you can't tell what a person thinks about any issue from their known opinion about one specific one.Phew, got through it in a couple of hours. A quick summary…
1. Trump can’t crack down on this, it’s a state issue. As an aside, I believe abortion is abhorrent.
2. Excellent idea. Non citizens should have no influence on electoral votes.
3. Excellent idea. The war on fossil fuels is destroying our economy.
4. Excellent idea.
5. Unconstitutional, although it hasn’t stopped the DOJ pursuing legal action against Biden‘s adversaries.
6. Excellent idea, meritocracy rules.
7. invade blue states? Again, a state issue.
8.
9. Utterly ridiculous.
10. Excellent idea.
WTFPhew, got through it in a couple of hours. A quick summary…
1. Trump can’t crack down on this, it’s a state issue. As an aside, I believe abortion is abhorrent.
Phew, got through it in a couple of hours. A quick summary…
3. Excellent idea. The war on fossil fuels is destroying our economy.
Chances are most Americans wouldn't have felt that way 50 years.
Hmm, let me think, would I prefer a weaker economy with no fossil fuels yet a habtiable planet for all or would I rather we destroyed the planet and only the very rich nations survive ( if they're lucky ) ? Difficult one I'll accept.
This demonstrates well that you can't tell what a person thinks about any issue from their known opinion about one specific one.
Just homing in on this point. Do you understand that from a global perspective this looks like you and those who think like you saying “let the world burn.”
Do you understand that anyone with kids, or perhaps able to contemplate further than their own navel, might see this as outright stupid?
Part of the problem is the definition of abortion by politicians as opposed by doctors/medical staff.Chances are most Americans wouldn't have felt that way 50 years.
Then abortion was just 'a Catholic problem'.
Things Fell Apart - S1. Ep 1: 1000 Dolls - S1. Ep 1: 1000 Dolls - BBC Sounds
Strange tales from the culture wars by Jon Ronson.www.bbc.co.uk
With the majority of US Catholics now in favour of a form of abortion laws.
In practice, Catholics’ views on abortion are not always aligned with the guidance of their church. Like U.S. adults overall, the majority of U.S. Catholics say abortion should be legal – at least in some cases – as do many Catholic legislators and other politicians
8 key findings about Catholics and abortion
Like U.S. adults overall, the majority of U.S. Catholics say abortion should be legal – at least in some cases.www.pewresearch.org
Obviously it's been 4 years since that study was published and a lot has changed.
It's amazing just how quickly women's rights have been eroded in the US.
Max Azzarello was a registered Democrat according to this article , sorry to disappoint you .One of Trump's supporters (I assume) has set himself on fire outside the courthouse in protest.
Shows the depth of lunacy amongst his supporters. Trump will probably derive a perverse sense of pride at such an extreme display of devotion to him whilst at the same time manipulating the narrative to blame Biden for the man's injuries...."if corrupt Biden hadnt had these charges brought against me that loyal patriot would not have felt compelled to set himself on fire"
Indeed.Part of the problem is the definition of abortion by politicians as opposed by doctors/medical staff.
A natural miscarriage is a spontaneous abortion which can happen in up to a third of pregnancies.
A missed miscarriage is a failed spontaneous abortion where the fetus has died but not aborted thereby rotting and needs a D&C (dilation and curettage) to prevent the woman from dying of an infection (fairly commonplace)
An ectopic pregnancy where the embryo hasn't reached the womb, but embeds itself in the fallopian tube, causing great danger to the mother, and needs medical intervention asap
All of these are acceptable by the church and medical treatment given.
Then there is the social aspect where a woman/girl is raped resulting in pregnancy.
Most churches will accept a very early abortion but in the case of Downs Syndrome babies, it can be as late as 37 weeks.
do you hold any shares in truth?Except there appears a lack of state witnesses.