The Bidens’ Influence Peddling Timeline - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountabilityoversight.house.gov
That‘s a lot of money coming into the coffers without providing any services…other than government access.
There’s plenty of proof, you’re just not interested in hearing it.
But I think those people are in the minority, which is why he won't be winning the next election. We can't be so sure about Trump, who is far far worse.
Maybe they should provide this evidence to prosecutors then?The Bidens’ Influence Peddling Timeline - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
That‘s a lot of money coming into the coffers without providing any services…other than government access.
There’s plenty of proof, you’re just not interested in hearing it.
Of course a worry but was a worry last time not much happened understand people are worried but he is a talker not a doer. Some of his talk like exiting Nato could never happen there are limits to what presidents can and cant do before more persistent power structures obstruct the maddest ideas. Dont have much faith in America but enough to think they wouldnt let this orange bum cause too much damage
The Bidens’ Influence Peddling Timeline - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
That‘s a lot of money coming into the coffers without providing any services…other than government access.
There’s plenty of proof, you’re just not interested in hearing it.
It will be interesting to watch how he handles himself in court next Monday, if he turns up.
Yeah, the trouble comes in the reading.Trumps speeches are written?
Not defending him but he did say that the Arizona total ban ‘goes too far’ - an impressive conciliatory position indeed for a misogynistic, serial sex offender (according to scores of women) - an emotional retard who thinks women’s bodies have no value at all other than to be objectified and serve his predatory behaviour.
You aren't suggesting....that he'll say anything to anyone . . . . to maximise leverage and traction . . . regardless of the content or how it was all different when he addressed another lot of people earlier? And so on? Shirley Knott?Not defending him but he did say that the Arizona total ban ‘goes too far’ - an impressive conciliatory position indeed for a misogynistic, serial sex offender (according to scores of women) - an emotional retard who thinks women’s bodies have no value at all other than to be objectified and serve his predatory behaviour.
Donald Trump says Arizona's 1864 abortion ban goes too far
The presumptive Republican presidential nominee also said he would not sign a federal abortion ban.www.bbc.co.uk
I wasn’t suggesting anything other than literally what I posted - a link to the BBC story posted this morning that Trump says the Arizona ban ‘goes too far’. He’s still a fcukwit with no conviction politics or ideology other than the pursuit of power for power’s sake, of course he’ll say whatever suits him at the time and tailor it to his audiences as he did in 1999 - I think I’ve made it pretty clear on this thread how I feel about the man.You aren't suggesting....that he'll say anything to anyone . . . . to maximise leverage and traction . . . regardless of the content or how it was all different when addressed another lot of people earlier? And so on? Shirley Knott?
When I said 'you're not suggesting', it wasn't an actual question. It was a comedic rhetorical way of touching base with the well-recognised concept that Trump will say anything to curry support and change what he says to suit his audience (in a 'lest we not forget' sort of way). I was inviting neither a 5 minute argument nor the full half hourI wasn’t suggesting anything other than literally what I posted - a link to the BBC story posted this morning that Trump says the Arizona ban ‘goes too far’. He’s still a fcukwit with no conviction politics or ideology other than the pursuit of power for power’s sake, of course he’ll say whatever suits him at the time and tailor it to his audiences as he did in 1999 - I think I’ve made it pretty clear on this thread how I feel about the man.
Loading…
www.nytimes.com
He’s not going to come out and support a total ban on abortion and hand the Election over to the Democrats.
Edit - the ironic tone of my post probably should have dispelled any impression I thought Trump not supporting the Arizona ban was anything to applaud him for.
Then you again you missed the tone of my post - I wasn’t trying to start ahalf hour argument just clarifying what I meant agreeing with youWhen I said 'you're not suggesting', it wasn't an actual question. It was a comedic rhetorical way of touching base with the well-recognised concept that Trump will say anything to curry support and change what he says to suit his audience (in a 'lest we not forget' sort of way). I was inviting neither a 5 minute argument nor the full half hour
Try not to talk in riddles 
It's as if two ******** people are trying to have a conversation, while competing to prove who agrees with the other the most vehementlyThen you again you missed the tone of my post - I wasn’t trying to start ahalf hour argument just clarifying what I meant agreeing with you
