Attack the North Stand in the first half?

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



element

Fear [is] the key.....
Jan 28, 2009
1,887
Local
I don't think it really matters, if we don't score in the first half in front of the North Stand, then we may score in front of the East Stand in the second. Or we may not score at all (heaven forbid)
Three Points is all i want!

Renagurellement, sil vous plait ???

:jester:
 






Aug 31, 2009
1,880
Brighton
I think we should attack the 1901's in the first half.


"Excellent idea! Make a note of that Darling, heavy artillery for the Brighton back line"

162018_106645219392475_7183406_n.jpg
 
Last edited:












Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick
I think we should attack the 1901's in the first half.

Why don't we go the whole hog and attack them in the second, too?
Mind you, we'd only have about 35 mins for that in the second half.
 








element

Fear [is] the key.....
Jan 28, 2009
1,887
Local
I thought the winner of the toss could elect which end to attack OR to kick off first ??? (From doing my Scout's sports badge about 1977!)
 




DTES

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
6,022
London
I thought the winner of the toss could elect which end to attack OR to kick off first ??? (From doing my Scout's sports badge about 1977!)

Yeah, it used to be. It was changed not so long ago so that the winner has to choose ends.
 


Paddy B

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
2,084
Horsham
Why don't we go the whole hog and attack them in the second, too?
Mind you, we'd only have about 35 mins for that in the second half.

Or why not at HT when they are stuffing their face with Prawn sandwiches. We in the WSL will climb up and rampage through under covering fire from the WSU.

Chaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
 






Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top