brightonrock
Dodgy Hamstrings
- Jan 1, 2008
- 2,482
- Thread starter
- #21
The 'negativity' was surely down to circumstance though? No fit right back so rather then a square peg in a round hole with el-abd @ RB, he changed the shape. Hammond & crofts together were to counter their physicality, wing backs to give the width and two up top - yes, two - which most people have wanted all season, including some who've wanted Buckley to be one if them. It didn't work, we conceded, he changed it - it paid off.
This is the point I'm making - rather than crediting the admission of a weakness and a positive change to rectify it, some would rather focus on the initial 'mistake', which looks to me to have been forced by injuries rather than an inherent negativity. But I suppose I'm a blind happy clapping poyet licker.
This is the point I'm making - rather than crediting the admission of a weakness and a positive change to rectify it, some would rather focus on the initial 'mistake', which looks to me to have been forced by injuries rather than an inherent negativity. But I suppose I'm a blind happy clapping poyet licker.