Bridcutt sold £3.25million. (with Sunderland kit picture)

armchairclubber · Jan 7, 2014

Jimmy Skaville said:
It does make you wonder if:

- Liam and Gus have been in cahoots all along
- Gus knew he couldn't afford Bloom's valuation
- Bridcutt subsequently under performs after return from injury to keep price down
- Transfer request as final throw of the dice

In cahoots may be a bit strong , I'd hope you can still build loyalty in football and I'd have thought Liam would have as much for Gus as the Albion, he brought him on a long way. So long as we get fair price think we should let him go, we now have some good cover after all.
p.s . no bitterness here, Liam did good for us, as did Gus

Mellor 3 Ward 4 · Jan 7, 2014

Not surprised at all.

This is 2014, he's got 10 years maximum in his profession.

Good luck Liam and thanks.

Now Tony, screw them for every penny you can.

Not Andy Naylor · Jan 7, 2014

patchamalbion said:
if he goes i'll clap him when he returns but my god I reckon that atmosphere against Sunderland could be immense.

Which would be very welcome these days.

Driver8 · Jan 7, 2014

So can we now add illegal tapping up to Gus's misdemeanours?

byf1 · Jan 7, 2014

The guys got no class, no class at all and I'm not talking just talking about the transfer request. His last two performance for the Albion have been a joke & that for me is not acceptable. It's not his job to force the clubs hand, why should we accept a lower fee, why should we be held to ransom!

No problem that the lad wants to further his career but not in this manor Liam.

Goldstone Rapper · Jan 7, 2014

Driver8 said:
So can we now add illegal tapping up to Gus's misdemeanours?

Can we sack him again?

Springal · Jan 7, 2014

Driver8 said:
So can we now add illegal tapping up to Gus's misdemeanours?

seagullsovergrimsby · Jan 7, 2014

Bladders said:
Could be, the club would have to pay up his contract out of the transfer fee if they sell him without a transfer request.

Doesn't make any sense , why would we have to pay up his contract ? Another club wants to buy him , making the initial approach and if he didn't ask for a transfer in the first place it would be up to himself and his agent to decide if personal terms are acceptable.

ozseagull · Jan 7, 2014

Gone way down in my estimation. Bad drills

ewe2 · Jan 7, 2014

shoreham seagull 1973 said:
From Sunderlands forum - "Its a sign of how bad things have got when we are getting excited about the possible signing of a lad from Brighton"

Hmmmm it sounds as if they are not that impressed

......But they will be !.....

Driver8 · Jan 7, 2014

Goldstone Rapper said:
Can we sack him again?

No but we can report Sunderland to the FA.

Silkster365 · Jan 7, 2014

Can we suspend him? for 2 months.

soistes · Jan 7, 2014

byf1 said:
No problem that the lad wants to further his career but not in this manor Liam.

It's clear that Brighton is not the manor in which he wants to pursue his career....

brakespear · Jan 7, 2014

Goldstone Rapper said:
But don't forget it's Gus who put you where you are now
And Gus can take you back down too.

fyp

shoreham seagull 1973 · Jan 7, 2014

HawkTheSeagull said:
Do we need to spend the money - especially on a replacement ? Ince and Andrews are good enough to replace him.

All we need is Conway, this should open the door back up for him.

Do we not need to get Ince a contract and Andrews a transfer to us from Bolton?

Raleigh Chopper · Jan 7, 2014

At his best my opinion is that Liam is good enough for the premiership but not that good that he can change the course of a side struggling at the bottom.
Sunderland do not need that type of player, if they want a midfielder they need one that can score on a regular basis.
I also think there has been some dirty work going on behind the scenes with Poyet, Bloom may pull the tapping up card from the pack.

Bladders · Jan 7, 2014

seagullsovergrimsby said:
Doesn't make any sense , why would we have to pay up his contract ? Another club wants to buy him and if he didn't ask for a transfer in the first place it would be up to himself and his agent to decide if personal terms are acceptable.

Bridcutt is under contract to us, if we decide to sell him to another club then we have to pay the remainder of his contract up, why should he lose out on his agreed contract just cause we have decided to sell him to another interested club.

if he asks to leave however, we dont.

Thunder Bolt · Jan 7, 2014

byf1 said:
The guys got no class, no class at all and I'm not talking just talking about the transfer request. His last two performance for the Albion have been a joke & that for me is not acceptable. It's not his job to force the clubs hand, why should we accept a lower fee, why should we be held to ransom!

No problem that the lad wants to further his career but not in this manor Liam.

There is no difference to Elliott Bennett two years ago. Nsc posters complained that he didn't seem to be playing as well as normal just before he handed in a transfer request. It's all over the top emotional twaddle.

Goldstone Rapper · Jan 7, 2014

brakespear said:
fyp

Thanks. But did Gus find him working as a waitress in a cocktail bar, though?

Prettyboyshaw · Jan 7, 2014

Shame brilliant player for us and even tho we have Ince it's would be nice to keep him but you can't blame someone for wanting to double or treble their wages.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Bridcutt sold £3.25million. (with Sunderland kit picture)

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

On the road...

Active member

Rediffusion PlayerofYear

Well-known member

#cpfctinpotclub

New member

Well-known member

On the road...

Oooo its a corner

Well-known member

Doctor Worm

New member

New member

Twats everywhere

Silly old bat

Rediffusion PlayerofYear

Well-known member

Share this page