Search results

I thought completely the opposite! Thought Calleri would struggle without the space and time afforded by poor defences whereas Bolanos would have enough skill to buy himself that half a yard to be effective where most seem to fail. Unfortunately we won't get to see either but it's interesting...

Would certainly be an anti climax of epic proportions! #SameOldAlbion

Is this groundhog day?

No, but I have learnt this... #sameoldalbion :)

Pretty much, but this guy I reckon is the real deal, **** Calleri!

Certainly sounds that way. Shame as I think he would have been awesome! The more I look into him the better he seems and the more sex-wee at the proposition of us signing him. With Udinese and Sampdoria also interested, it's a sinking feeling when I admit to myself that it looks as if he's going...

Sounds as if theres a fair bit of competition for his signature, so expecting this one to run the course and as usual, end in a massive anti-climax.

Nobody seems best policy :)

Someone did though, only they know who they are! It's changed back now anyway :)

Congratulations on changing wikipedia! Poor effort.

Do you think we need another left back? :jester:

I guess that's the risk you have to take, worked alright with Ulloa, but yes, could name a dozen that didn't cut it. As for Bolanos, I can't see it happening, think it's totally unrealistic and would expect him to go elsewhere for way more than we can pay. Prefer the look of him to Calleri and...

I wouldn't worry, find it highly unlikely we'll sign a player of that quality this window, at least it shows we're out there looking I guess even if our sights are maybe a little over ambitious.

http://studiofutbol.com.ec/2016/01/03/miller-bolanos-en-la-mira-del-brighton-de-inglaterra/

Yep, each of those are equally as likely to sign for us.

Forestieri a big big yes, not Vydra for me though.