Search results

Well, if you read the whole article you’ll understand precisely why she did it. It’s a physical demonstration of who she thinks we are treating Tom Moore’s efforts in life. Intrigued as to why you didn’t paste that bit of the article? I must admit that I find the link to UK private jets...

Like you, I've been an environmentalist for longer than I can remember. That's a lie. I can remember. I started out in the marketing team at The Body Shop in the early 90s, back in the times when everyone was screaming 'freaks' at us; laughing at the aspirations and trying to question and...

You don't need to hear from a campaigns expert. Were you talking about this issue with the same ferocity last week? These people aren't out to make friends, they are out to get noticed and get the issue further up the political agenda. They ain't selling Persil. And the more this happens, the...

I disagree. I think the tactics are dead right. It's making it tangible for you. You don't want your journey disrupted, and you are talking about it. It's also simply not possible to harm the reputation of a cause that is about saving the planet. These people aren't all crusties anymore, they...

Delighted that you can now see what my limits are, despite your passive aggressive attempts to suggest otherwise.

Sadly, none of those would get them noticed, bar breaking into somewhere. But where? And what impact does that action need to have. Maybe a mass sit down on the tracks to stop you getting to the Amex and other grounds would work.

Sorry? Are you talking to me or Sir David Attenborough?

I understand your frustration, but can you think of a method.

Not really. Nobody took any interest in universal suffrage for women until direct action expedited the process. Arguably what we are witnessing today - and will increasingly witness - is of equal or greater importance because it is a threat to human existence.

I think I have made it pretty clear that I support the direct action that is presently being taken.It would appear you are trying to conflate the issue of actions that lead to indirectly and directly to death, and that is also a politicians technique, which you've deployed a number of times on...

What do you think? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not really. I care very much about people not dying. As do the NHS. Take a look at some of their strategy papers. Climate change is predicted to become the biggest killer, outweighing COVID by a country mile. However, those deaths are intangible (although not if you are caught in an extreme...

I wonder if they said the same thing about Emily Davison? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s a pretty amateur attempt, but par for the course given previous posts from you that I’ve read. I’ll let you work out the difference yourself. You should be able to. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Empty words? Good grief. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I hear what you say. There will be damage to peoples lives. In some cases (e.g. an ambulance trying to get to a hospital) there may be loss of life. I hope it is not me who feels the effect of such action), but the implications to loss of livelihood, health and way of life for everyone if we do...

The future of the planet.

I fully support their behaviour. Direct action is the only thing that will work now. As it is, it may be too late.