......and the f******* band. All they do is slow down the tempo; Great Escape - meh, turgid; National Anthem - before the match, yes, during it, no!. Unless they can learn to play Babylon's Burning or Tomorrow Girls or something similarly frenetic to drive the team on, they should eff off.
Think I'd put Barkley, Stones and Lallana into the 'in' camp, and possibly I'd swap Sturridge for Welbeck. Not sure I'd go with Henderson (although probably squad) and I didn't think Drinkwater really played himself into contention tonight either.
And goalkeeping-wise, I thought Forster was...
Really? Seemed to get an important block or interception in any time one was really needed, and promptly despatched the ball to the half way line or beyond which was fine, because England would then fanny around with it for five minutes, gradually working the ball back to the GK, before...
Not a bad point there - I'm sure I remember the Brazil World Cup winning team of 1970 were supposed to be pretty crap defensively.
Have concerns about both last night's CBs - particularly Smalling - but I actually think they did a half decent job last night.
Hello, hello - is this the NSC anti-Liverpool agenda showing its face again? (Apologies if it isn't, but NSC does have a bit of form on this.............................................)
Don't get confused. It's quite simple. We shouldn't play Henderson, Welbeck or Lallana because they've played before and failed (not my opinion, someone else's that I was responding to). By that logic, the seven others who have played before can also be said to have failed (they were in the same...
.....and set up as 4-3-3 according to Sky, not 4-2-3-1. Looks a fairly decent team to me, though I don't think England are as well off for defenders as we traditionally have been.