Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Dunk - Refusing to play?



Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,227
Goldstone
Refusing to play (assuming the Argus is factually correct) will in all likelihood be against their contract, hence the fine.
And as I said, I wouldn't be happy if a player refused to play, but I don't know that's what happened. Ignoring that part, some do not think a player should leave for higher pay, and I don't agree with them on that point.
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
I don't blame Dunk for wanting more money but i hope we sell him now. There is ways of getting a move but refusing to play for the club that has made him into the payer he is today is a joke.

I dont know the story, not many will.

But it is likely that discussions have taken place between Dunk own representatives, the club and someone from any possible suitors.

Someone somewhere has advised that it would be in the interest of Dunk and the recipient club to not become cup tied, this would have been discussed between all parties, why wouldnt it, it would be the reasonable and professional thing to do when contemplating a £5m business transaction.

It shouldnt follow that he threw off his boots and went on strike, more likely he found Brighton intransigence to not consider his wishes unfair, more likely the club playing hardball without so much of a thought to Dunks wishes, just to trouser another million.

Footballers have long memories, he no doubt remembers that time he was dropped without communication, perhaps a favourite coach was sacked a team mate treated poorly and a boardroom member going back on his word about a bonus, new contract who knows, nothing exclusive to BHA but perhaps by now he feels HE deserves better.

Of course he might just be selfish SOB, but I somehow doubt it, the spin will continue and many will decide to hate him and think its another example of footballers power, but dont believe it, the boardrooms still hold the power and owners and his mates will be casually chatting to other board member of another club to see if they fancy taking their midfielder at a sale price, only thing is that player has no idea ..... yet.
 




Hampster Gull

New member
Dec 22, 2010
13,462
And as I said, I wouldn't be happy if a player refused to play, but I don't know that's what happened. Ignoring that part, some do not think a player should leave for higher pay, and I don't agree with them on that point.

They have signed a contract, which is a commitment of reward for services for a period of time. They then find ways to break that commitment. That Is poor form. I have a contract which means i have to give six months notice and i have always worked it.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,227
Goldstone
We all would move for more money and I was just stating that the family feeding frenzie doesn't really come into it when you already earn about 8k a week.
I (double checks) didn't say 'feed'. He'd earn over a million with us in the next few years (even without a pay-rise). If he got injured, and that's the end of his football career, you can bet he (and his family) would be pretty pissed off if he didn't choose to make it 4 million. So when this much money is waved at you, I imagine many partners would be suggesting you take it.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,227
Goldstone
They have signed a contract, which is a commitment of reward for services for a period of time. They then find ways to break that commitment. That Is poor form.
What are you talking about? You're replying to my post, where I said I wouldn't be happy if he had refused to play. If he hasn't refused to play, then he's not breaking the commitment is he.
 
























Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
All's well that ends well.

Time to forget his mistake at Southend, I reckon.
 


Hyperion

New member
Nov 1, 2010
5,314
Regarding the 'refusing to play' issue, if this was true, I don't remember reading anywhere as to the reason why this was. It may not have been anything to do with any bids from another club or him wanting to go.
 




Diego Napier

Well-known member
Mar 27, 2010
4,416
Hopefully all the histrionics from the hysterics can now die down and in the due course of time Dunky can become revered, emulating the journeys of Saul and St. Calderon.
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Regarding the 'refusing to play' issue, if this was true, I don't remember reading anywhere as to the reason why this was. It may not have been anything to do with any bids from another club or him wanting to go.

He did, as the Argus confirmed it. He didn't want to be cup tied if offers came in. It was dealt with and he was ready to play at Fulham.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here