vendit dimittere exequendis
Scorchio, heh heh! Nio dudupos, sminki pinki tenuros tomano... Graba da bols!!
vendit dimittere exequendis
Scorchio, heh heh! Nio dudupos, sminki pinki tenuros tomano... Graba da bols!!
Scorchio, heh heh! Nio dudupos, sminki pinki tenuros tomano... Graba da bols!!
It happened on Labours watch.
More importantly the data was only given to HMRC in 2010 and the Tory/LibDem coalition have conveniently turned a blind eye so as not to upset their rich buddies but instead launch scathing attacks on benefit cheats.
apart from the £135m reportedly recovered by HMRC to their satisfaction. seems to some want the HMRC to send people to court to recover money, when their current process has already done so. sounds like a waste of courts time to me.
if you're a HSBC customer, you should probably be more concerned about the "wistleblower" taking the account information from the bank. thats the real story here, not that a bank offers offshore bank accounts.
If we all just get on with our lives then they'll be left with a free rei(g)n, so I won't ignore it.
apart from the £135m reportedly recovered by HMRC to their satisfaction. seems to some want the HMRC to send people to court to recover money, when their current process has already done so. sounds like a waste of courts time to me.
Why would anyone who feels strongly about this vote for the former stockbroker and the scorner of the working classes Nigel Farage? Him and his mates love a bit of the old tax evasion, I'm sure.
this is a 7 year old story and information has been with HMRC for 4 years according to the article, why it wasnt passed on immediatly should make you wonder the motives for the theft.
I was wondering how you would find a way to defend the Status Quo on this one 5/10 for that one I am afraid.
another one... where is it that i'm defending anything? are we not allowed to highlight unsaid issues that may be as significant as the prescribed story? must fit in to neat for/against sides?
£135M could be a very small percentage of what is actually due if thousands of seriously rich individuals have been evading tax for decades.
You can. But saying the whistle-blower sat on his haul is wrong.
possibly, but the article implies they've wrapped up their investigation. getting £135m out of 1100 individual sounds like a pretty decent haul, £123k each on average.
Yet some retired professional footballers are now being chased for investing in schemes that the HMRC now say are dodgy and face handing over seven figure sums to clear their tax bills.
another one... where is it that i'm defending anything? are we not allowed to highlight unsaid issues that may be as significant as the prescribed story? must fit in to neat for/against sides?
possibly, but the article implies they've wrapped up their investigation. getting £135m out of 1100 individual sounds like a pretty decent haul, £123k each on average.
i dont trust any "whistle blower" that doesnt go to authorities immediatly. to sit on this sort of information for years would serve little purpose other than fraud in my mind. just to capture it and remove from the system in the first place, rather than alert the authorities, makes the motivation suspicious. thats why i raised it, because i'd be very concerned how it was lifted without detection, especially given the high value nature. if they dont protect the wealthy customers they cant care much for rest of us and while this isnt "news" within IT security circles, that certainly should be of great concern to the general public.