Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Gaza(not the footballer) is going seriously Boobz Up
- Thread starter pastafarian
- Start date
User removed 4
New member
Its infantile I know , I wish I could turn the other cheek and ignore him.
A charity boxing match for the REMF is the answer. I don't think he'd be up for it though.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
daveinprague
New member
So, what did you mean about meeting me and 'knocking my words down my throat' bottle boy?
You threaten me, I gladly accept your offer, and thats 'grandstanding'....in your pussy world.
Ill be in Brighton mid Oct...that gives you plenty of time to formulate a more credible excuse...
oh, and I hear that im not the first person you have 'offered to meet'.....so, youre a serial wanker?
daveinprague
New member
Yes...playground threats are infantile....especially when there is no intention to follow them up.
Seriously, a charity boxing match between you and bushy would be top class entertainment. How about it?
(Does anyone know a couple of complete pikies we could put on the undercard?)
daveinprague
New member
No..I dont 'do' boxing...if he wants to fight me, theres not really going to be any rules...
Youre welcome of course, to come and watch bottling bushey ...'knock my words down my throat'......
Im looking forward to that myself.
Youre welcome of course, to come and watch bottling bushey ...'knock my words down my throat'......
Im looking forward to that myself.
User removed 4
New member
ive just seen his reply to you sim, remember mid October , you can come along and watch if you want , but no doubt he'll insist on meeting somewhere very public where ill get arrested , you watch him wriggle out of it.
That's OK, we can do a cage match. No holds barred. Perfect.
I'd fancy my chances against a perma-frothing kiddie-fiddling middle-aged moron like you, to be honest. Bring it on.
pastafarian
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #135
This. Well done dave, I assumed you were a bit of a pussy and a total gobshite until you agreed to this no-rules fight. Lovely stuff. Mind you, if that's your choice then I'd assume NSC was unlikely to sponsor it. So as London Irish would say, you'll both have the blood of innocent Palestinians on your hands, as they could be ones to lose out on the charidy money. Poor.
This. I never thought he'd actually agree to a tables, ladders and chairs cage fight, but now he has I don't see why NSC can't sponsor it. I'm particularly looking forward to the betting game, I'm placing 400,000 vcash on Bushy.
London Irish
Well-known member
The geopolitical disagreements we have are lengthy no doubt, but no time to thrash them out now - we'll agree to disagree on a lot of that history.
I just want to make it clear that the notion of the "Jewish lobby" being a key factor here is utterly wrong - this religious language is utter crap but if you want to parody it, you can say that if Palestinians have a problem with the USA, it's undoubtedly the Christian lobby which makes up the vast majority of its legislators.
I'm constantly impressed by the number of American jews who make very brave stands in favour of the Palestinians despite the mass media parrotting of Israeli propaganda.
This video here is utterly electrifying:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0CulhsQkTA
Last edited:
I suspect we have a better chance of a Middle East resolution than an NSC one by the looks of it.
"On the fourth day of Israel's most recent onslaught against Gaza's Palestinian population, President Barack Obama declared, "No country on Earth would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders." In an echo of Israeli officials, he sought to frame Israel's aerial missile strikes against the 360-square kilometer Strip as the just use of armed force against a foreign country. Israel's ability to frame its assault against territory it occupies as a right of self-defense turns international law on its head.
A state cannot simultaneously exercise control over territory it occupies and militarily attack that territory on the claim that it is "foreign" and poses an exogenous national security threat. In doing precisely that, Israel is asserting rights that may be consistent with colonial domination but simply do not exist under international law. "
- Noura Erakat
A state cannot simultaneously exercise control over territory it occupies and militarily attack that territory on the claim that it is "foreign" and poses an exogenous national security threat. In doing precisely that, Israel is asserting rights that may be consistent with colonial domination but simply do not exist under international law. "
- Noura Erakat