there was no moon landing .... discus

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Curious Orange

Punxsatawney Phil
Jul 5, 2003
9,982
On NSC for over two decades...
I think this supports my case? yeah along with the other 2 videos, care to right them off too?
jesus your dumb, It's a man who helped design the twin towers in an interview way before 2001 proving the towers can't be knocked down by planes, not a murderer!

Frank A DeMartini was not involved in the design of the World Trade Centre, but he was involved in its maintenance and had offices there. He died aiding in the evacuation of the building.
 




One Love

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2011
4,400
Brighton
Another video. And this one is 8 minutes long.

Do you know I just can't be bothered anymore.

I have to assume that Falmer is a troll like Colinz.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,399
Erm errhh well errh it was a terror attack caused by hitler on his own people blamed on the russians so they'd all justify a war. It's the tactic used for war.

theres a couple of event in 1930s German leading to Hitlers power, which ever one you mean wasnt blamed on the Russians, nor as a pretext to war. Communist and other left wingers where blamed not outside agents. The war, years later, was justified by a completely different premise: that the Germanic people wanted to rejoin the motherland, so Austria, Czech, and Poland needed to come under German rule. Only, the Polish didnt really agree so much. Germany and Russia entered a peace pact which held untill 1941, when it was broken on a whim.

but dont let basic historic facts get in the your version of reality.
 






tezz79

New member
Apr 20, 2011
1,541
Erm errhh well errh it was a terror attack caused by hitler on his own people blamed on the russians so they'd all justify a war. It's the tactic used for war.

I told you ages ago I knew what you were talking about regarding Germany but you still won't tell me if you believe a plane of some sort hit the towers, why won't you answer falmer ?
 


Falmer

Banned
Nov 22, 2010
1,356
Earth
theres a couple of event in 1930s German leading to Hitlers power, which ever one you mean wasnt blamed on the Russians, nor as a pretext to war. Communist and other left wingers where blamed not outside agents. The war, years later, was justified by a completely different premise: that the Germanic people wanted to rejoin the motherland, so Austria, Czech, and Poland needed to come under German rule. Only, the Polish didnt really agree so much. Germany and Russia entered a peace pact which held untill 1941, when it was broken on a whim.

but dont let basic historic facts get in the your version of reality.

read what you've just typed and try and relate it to now. You might see something.
 




tezz79

New member
Apr 20, 2011
1,541
yes i can supply you with evidence but it seems for some reason anything via a video (visual learning) is deemed on NSC nonsense with little evidence.

Says the person who refuses to disagree with colinz little CGI theory
 








beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,399
read what you've just typed and try and relate it to now. You might see something.

you'll have to help me out, as i cant think of any contempory situation where a dictator has taken charge of a major nation, nor where one nation is attempting to re-unite an ethnic group or old borders, or think of a recent peace pact that is likly to be broken sometime in the next few years. I see some events where some nations dont like whats going in another nation, and they want to intervene, but i fail to see any parallels to 1930s in this.
 


tezz79

New member
Apr 20, 2011
1,541
read my posts, I've made it VERY clear.

So you said in an earlier post that eyewitnesses saw a black plane with blacked out windows, I therefore take it that you disagree with colinz & you do believe that a plane (of some kind) hit the the tower/towers.
Now I'm stuck with the dilemma of choosing who's theory is more credible, yours or colinz ?
Surely if one of you is talking shit with so much conviction it's possible that you both could be
 


Falmer

Banned
Nov 22, 2010
1,356
Earth
you'll have to help me out, as i cant think of any contempory situation where a dictator has taken charge of a major nation, nor where one nation is attempting to re-unite an ethnic group or old borders, or think of a recent peace pact that is likly to be broken sometime in the next few years. I see some events where some nations dont like whats going in another nation, and they want to intervene, but i fail to see any parallels to 1930s in this.

Put the news on please, what are china, russia, argentina all stressing over? whats the middle-east stressing over? whats north-africa crying about? There's a big world wide army operation going on right now, even the olympics gets fitted with missles! and who are the enimies? leftwingers (occupy, anonymous etc) and local civilians from 'enemy' nations. If you think the UN entering countries such as Syria and the Maldives is because of peace and a very helpul nature, then I accept and understand your opinion on this topic. Each to their own I suppose?
 
Last edited:




Falmer

Banned
Nov 22, 2010
1,356
Earth
So you said in an earlier post that eyewitnesses saw a black plane with blacked out windows, I therefore take it that you disagree with colinz & you do believe that a plane (of some kind) hit the the tower/towers.
Now I'm stuck with the dilemma of choosing who's theory is more credible, yours or colinz ?
Surely if one of you is talking shit with so much conviction it's possible that you both could be

In the words of Newton- Think for yourself. (that includes whatever the tv is telling you)
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,399
Put the news on please, what are china, russia, argentina all stressing over? whats the middle-east stressing over? whats north-africa crying about?

clearly i miss something in the news or dont understand. please come on and explain yourself not leave it for the rest of us to be misled. personally I can think of about four different and seperate issues covered there.

so just what are China, Russia and Argentina, the middle east all stessing over? what is north Africa crying about. give us clear guidance, or shut the f*** up.
 


Since1982

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2006
1,505
Burgess Hill
Ok -now had a chance to review and research the US Camerman video. Reported by Press TV the mouthpiece of the Iranian government with a clear anti - US agenda so unless there is collaborative evidence of the assertion (as yet totally unproven) that the video this guy has shows something new then this is not worth the videotape used to make the report. As to the missile one - utterly unconvincing. In any case, I thought the panes didn't exist and it was all CGI? So why CGI a missile when you want people to believe it was a plane?
 


tezz79

New member
Apr 20, 2011
1,541
In the words of Newton- Think for yourself. (that includes whatever the tv is telling you)

So colinz is wrong with his crazy CGI theory ?
We are all wrong & you are the only person (on this forum) that REALLY knows what went on...... Wow !!!
 




Falmer

Banned
Nov 22, 2010
1,356
Earth
Ok -now had a chance to review and research the US Camerman video. Reported by Press TV the mouthpiece of the Iranian government with a clear anti - US agenda so unless there is collaborative evidence of the assertion (as yet totally unproven) that the video this guy has shows something new then this is not worth the videotape used to make the report. As to the missile one - utterly unconvincing. In any case, I thought the panes didn't exist and it was all CGI? So why CGI a missile when you want people to believe it was a plane?

what about what the physicist mentions? or the chemical engineer? what's your opinion on their theory?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top