Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

**** The official AND ONLY 'Albion players arrested' thread ****







Aug 23, 2011
1,864
Precedent set by Sunderland this season, who suspended Titus Bramble after he was arrested on suspicion of sexual assault.

I'm not recommending that, just pointing it out.

I get the feeling that was initiated by Steve Bruce because as soon as O'Neil came in he was back in the team (unless the case has been resolved which i haven't heard)
 




fire&skill

Killer-Diller
Jan 17, 2009
4,296
Shoreham-by-Sea
What is sexual assault sounds silly i know but what does it cover.

Yippee! Wikipedia's back!

United Kingdom
[edit] England and Wales

Sexual assault is a statutory offence in England and Wales. It is created by section 3 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which defines "sexual assault" as when a person (A)

intentionally touches another person (B),
the touching is sexual,
B does not consent to the touching, and
A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

And also:

Sexual Offences Act 2003
 














countrygull

Active member
Jul 22, 2003
1,114
Horsham
Okay, then why did the Argus say "accused"? If a person is arrested under suspicion of a crime (with a certain amount of evidence but possibly not yet enough to charge), and they are released without charge, then how is it accurate to report that that person was "accused"?

This is lazy journalism. He is a suspect, not the accused. The term comes from the journalist`s belief that during questioning, the suspect will be accused of complicity. It's common - but inaccurate - parlance by some journalists.
 




Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick








Dominoid

Albion fan in Devon
Jan 6, 2011
557
Plymouth, United Kingdom
I personally find it particularly ironic that the Argus have gone with a controversial headline on the exact same day that the Leveson enquiry is discussing local newspapers.


Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
 






But were they arrested as witnesses, or were they also suspected of involvement?
In the particular case I'm thinking of (which ultimately resulted in no charges being brought) one co-operative witness identified a number of other potential witnesses (who could corroborate the facts of the alleged case, with a view to establishing that no case existed). ALL of the names put forward by the first witness resulted in arrests.
 


This is lazy journalism. He is a suspect, not the accused. The term comes from the journalist`s belief that during questioning, the suspect will be accused of complicity. It's common - but inaccurate - parlance by some journalists.
... and would never have happened when Phil Mills was Chief Crime Reporter for the Argus.
 






Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,192
West Sussex
In the particular case I'm thinking of (which ultimately resulted in no charges being brought) one co-operative witness identified a number of other potential witnesses (who could corroborate the facts of the alleged case, with a view to establishing that no case existed). ALL of the names put forward by the first witness resulted in arrests.

Do they give you a chance not to be arrested? and just go in and 'help them with their enquiries'? or is there a good reason, either for them or perhaps for you, for them to arrest you instead?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here