I think you meant ‘incorrect’.
And yes, that was the point of my original and subsequent posts - terms like ‘socialism’ and ‘fascism’ are often used as derogatory terms by those on opposing sides of the political spectrum with no reference to the ideology from which they spring - on both sides of the pond but they are also terms which have no agreed definition, unless you accept the Clause 4 definition - which has never been consolidated anywhere - all societies which have called themselves ‘socialist’ or have ’socialist‘ in the name are versions of watered down ’socialism’ - no society has ever been truly egalitarian and no society’s people have ever owned all the means of production.
Joking or not, no, I meant 'correct'. Because while I accept that no society has been truly egalitarian, I do think the word is used correctly here - not so much as an attack by the right wing, but as a badge of honour for those who want a more equal society. eg. the Socialist Party. It may not be pure socialism, but it is meant in the correct sense, as opposed to a general attack on anyone who dares think we should help others in society, or tax the wealthy in any way.