who do u think will be in goal 2mow

[brightonmad999]

mikkel andersen
john sullivan

 

[Brighton Breezy]

John Sullivan.

No real reason to drop him.

 

[bristolseagull]

its an interesting one, got to be Sullivan for me though.

 

[Silent Bob]

Andersen. Not been signed to sit on the bench.

 

[dougdeep]

Anderson. (Please no more text speak)

 

[severnside gull]

Sullivan is reported to be having injections in his knee. I think that may be good enough reason to take him out of the firing line after Crewe and start afresh with an almost entirely new backline who won't be plagued by doubt if they get put under pressure or go a goal behind.

So I'm going for Andersen

 

[strings]

Sullivan if fit...

 

[Brighton Breezy]

Sullivan has been carrying an injury for weeks.

 

[SirDouglasLoft]

Andersen. Not been signed to sit on the bench.

Exactly.

 

[supaseagull]

speaking to my reading supporting mate - reckons we've got a good signing and "one for the future".


Bit of a dodgy kick on him though!

 

[brightonmad999]

everyone says that about keepers

 

[empire]

as i said in another thread,sulley had injections in his mknee yesterday and in his words is doubtful,going on to say are signing a keeper,pleased its the reading lad,very well thought of and will make a great addition tom

 

[dougdeep]

sulley had injections in his mknee

Is he Scottish?

 

[Brighton Breezy]

It baffles me people are quick to suggest ditching Sully, who has done nothing wrong, for a keeper who is, if anything, less experienced and will have only trained with the back four ONCE at most.

We have to win tomorrow. Not the time to shove a new keeper in.

 

[brightonmad999]

i was only asking who would be in goal thats why i made the poll to c who people would say who would be in goal

 

[Don Tmatter]

I went for Sully, but if he's been having injections in his knee, best if Andersen plays.

 

[Glees]

anderson