Which would be YOUR choice for a front two?

[Brighton Breezy]

Quite simply, who would you like to see starting up top in our next league match?

 

[Brighton Breezy]

Sandaza left out because he appears to have disappeared.

 

[Da Man Clay]

Murray and Wood. I have a feeling there is a reason behind Murray not playing though. Putting 2 and 2 together and probably making 5 i'd say it was to do with contract discussion. Given we've just signed Bennett to a longer term deal, I would presume we'd have been having a similar conversation with Murray...

 

[Icy Gull]

Murray and Barnes with Wood to come on if needed. I reckon Wood has probably got a "must play if fit" clause in his loan agreement though

 

[Trigger]

Murray WITH Wood.

 

[Brighton Breezy]

I reckon Wood has probably got a "must play if fit" clause in his loan agreement though

I hope not considering he had failed to find the net in seven loan matches at Barnsley.

 

[Steve Foster]

Anyone except Hart & Holroyd

 

[Safeway]

Murray and Wood. I thought Wood was our best player all night, and we looked far better when Murray came on.

 

[bright1064]

Murray and Barnes.

It worked before and now it's being changed. I don't get it?

 

[Titanic]

Murray and Barnes with Wood to come on if needed. I reckon Wood has probably got a "must play if fit" clause in his loan agreement though

Brilliant! We haven't seen that NSC Classic chestnut for a while. Nice work

 

[Rookie]

Murray and at the moment Wood. Harsh on Barnes but ...

 

[Icy Gull]

Brilliant! We haven't seen that NSC Classic chestnut for a while. Nice work

If he was wanted by as many clubs as suggested, mostly in a division above us and wasn't getting too many games at Barnsley it could be a genuine, if unwelcome, chestnut...

 

[HP Seagull]

Murray and Barnes, they play excellently together.

 

[Brighton Breezy]

Come on. Own up. Who said Gary Hart?

 

[narly101]

Murray and Barnes.

It worked before and now it's being changed. I don't get it?

this

 

[Del Boy]

Murray Barnes

 

[Don Quixote]

Murray and Wood.

 

[Safeway]

Murray and Barnes.

It worked before and now it's being changed. I don't get it?

Because Wood is clearly a better footballer than Barnes. Surely that was the point of signing him?

 

[Brighton Breezy]

Because Wood is clearly a better footballer than Barnes. Surely that was the point of signing him?

Exactamundo.

 

[We're the Stripes]

Wood's an odd one, really - as he's bigger, probably stronger than Murray, yet no-where near as good at holding up the ball and bringing others into play. However, when he's facing goal and being direct is when he looks at his most effective. I'd like to see how he and Murray would get on starting together, but Gus seems to be using Glenn as our super-sub.. which to be fair has worked to an extent, but it's also meant sacrificing the first 60 minutes of the game.