Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
what EXACTLY did prince charles do?
- Thread starter alan partridge
- Start date
I put it to you, your Royal Highness, that you do indeed stink of piss and that on the night in question you were caught with Dwayne up your Chimney.
How do you plead?
How do you plead?
Last edited:
Lord Bracknell
On fire
The spokesperson of the Windsor intervenes on a gossip and the prince denies in Tv a love story col butler
Carlo: "Now enough I is not gay" from the ours corresponding ENRICO FRANCESCHINI
The prince Carlo LONDON - Any thing is, the prince Carlo says that he did not do it. It will stay in the annals of Buckingham Palace like the more bizarre denial of all of the times: "I Want to affirm clear and round", does to know the heir to the throne means its secretary, "that the chats moved about in the last times check me, but I am entirely fake".
It does they say in concrete those chats, Carlo not if hears it about to tell it; and up to now not even the local media were able to speak it freely because of the severe British law on the libel. But it is a story that circle the same for some time, on Internet, in the allusions of the English newspapers to what writes the foreign printing, and in the warning more time expressed openly from all of the media of here that the event, if came to the light, would be able "to make to fall the monarchy".
Well then, now it is coming to the light, it is too in oblique manner: it says itself in fact the (assumed) sinner, not the sin, but you suffice the same to understand (almost) all. We summarize, in three actions. First action: in 1995, George Smith, valletto of the princess Diana, them yourselves it it of to to be been raped two times from an employee of court and of to have then seen the sodomita to read with a limb of the real house.
Diana registers the deposition on a videocassette, then taken care of from its butler Paul Burrell, therefore disappeared or confined from the police. The stage, according to the indiscretions made subsequently to leak from the butler, would have gone so: Smith opens the door of a room and discovers one of the Windsor under the sheet, between the arms of its violator. - Publicity -
But who it is the prince (the elderly Filippo? Carlo? one of its smaller brothers, Andrea or Edoardo?) and what servant shares of it the bed? No it says it. According to action. The other day, an authoritative newspaper, the Guardian, it is gotten ready to reveal the name of the real servant of palace to the center of a news, difficult deposition of George Smith. The tribunal, on request of the anonymous servant (that recruits the most expensive lawyers of the Kingdom), forbids the publication.
The Guardian does appeal, wins and the name jumps outside. It is Michael Fawcett, for years butler of Carlo. Between the two, second Diana, there was a very tight relation: perhaps too much. In another, umpteenth videocassette, the princess would have declared that Fawcett arrived at the point of "to spread the toothpaste on the brush" of Carlo, that the two had a connection "unhealthy", "ecessively summons", that were "to inconvenience" if surprised together alone. The princess suspected, well, that its husband and the servant had a homosexual connection.
Third action. From the Indian one where it is in official visit, after a month of burning revelations of the tabloid on Diana, Carlo loses the patience, revealing to be he the princely object of everything those chats. "Ammettiamolo, is of me that slander", affirms in substance, "but are all bales", even if Poirot or Sherlock Holmes has had sufficient evidence to think the opposite one. However, now the protagonists of the assumed "triangle" I am known, and the tabloid happy titolano: "I and my valletti, all falsehood, says Carlo", that a more than confirmation seems a denial, and at any rate contains before unknown information to the public.
It can give itself that the whole story is fake, and that the second warning that this event would do "to collapse the monarchy" is a typical exaggeration of the sensational printing. It is necessary to note, however, that yesterday if they the respectable newspapers are occupied of it also, and in first page. Even if it will be not true that it the monarchy is about to fall. But, with the future king compelled it deny to go read with its servant preferred, the crown does not seem to enjoy of excellent health.
Carlo: "Now enough I is not gay" from the ours corresponding ENRICO FRANCESCHINI
The prince Carlo LONDON - Any thing is, the prince Carlo says that he did not do it. It will stay in the annals of Buckingham Palace like the more bizarre denial of all of the times: "I Want to affirm clear and round", does to know the heir to the throne means its secretary, "that the chats moved about in the last times check me, but I am entirely fake".
It does they say in concrete those chats, Carlo not if hears it about to tell it; and up to now not even the local media were able to speak it freely because of the severe British law on the libel. But it is a story that circle the same for some time, on Internet, in the allusions of the English newspapers to what writes the foreign printing, and in the warning more time expressed openly from all of the media of here that the event, if came to the light, would be able "to make to fall the monarchy".
Well then, now it is coming to the light, it is too in oblique manner: it says itself in fact the (assumed) sinner, not the sin, but you suffice the same to understand (almost) all. We summarize, in three actions. First action: in 1995, George Smith, valletto of the princess Diana, them yourselves it it of to to be been raped two times from an employee of court and of to have then seen the sodomita to read with a limb of the real house.
Diana registers the deposition on a videocassette, then taken care of from its butler Paul Burrell, therefore disappeared or confined from the police. The stage, according to the indiscretions made subsequently to leak from the butler, would have gone so: Smith opens the door of a room and discovers one of the Windsor under the sheet, between the arms of its violator. - Publicity -
But who it is the prince (the elderly Filippo? Carlo? one of its smaller brothers, Andrea or Edoardo?) and what servant shares of it the bed? No it says it. According to action. The other day, an authoritative newspaper, the Guardian, it is gotten ready to reveal the name of the real servant of palace to the center of a news, difficult deposition of George Smith. The tribunal, on request of the anonymous servant (that recruits the most expensive lawyers of the Kingdom), forbids the publication.
The Guardian does appeal, wins and the name jumps outside. It is Michael Fawcett, for years butler of Carlo. Between the two, second Diana, there was a very tight relation: perhaps too much. In another, umpteenth videocassette, the princess would have declared that Fawcett arrived at the point of "to spread the toothpaste on the brush" of Carlo, that the two had a connection "unhealthy", "ecessively summons", that were "to inconvenience" if surprised together alone. The princess suspected, well, that its husband and the servant had a homosexual connection.
Third action. From the Indian one where it is in official visit, after a month of burning revelations of the tabloid on Diana, Carlo loses the patience, revealing to be he the princely object of everything those chats. "Ammettiamolo, is of me that slander", affirms in substance, "but are all bales", even if Poirot or Sherlock Holmes has had sufficient evidence to think the opposite one. However, now the protagonists of the assumed "triangle" I am known, and the tabloid happy titolano: "I and my valletti, all falsehood, says Carlo", that a more than confirmation seems a denial, and at any rate contains before unknown information to the public.
It can give itself that the whole story is fake, and that the second warning that this event would do "to collapse the monarchy" is a typical exaggeration of the sensational printing. It is necessary to note, however, that yesterday if they the respectable newspapers are occupied of it also, and in first page. Even if it will be not true that it the monarchy is about to fall. But, with the future king compelled it deny to go read with its servant preferred, the crown does not seem to enjoy of excellent health.
Lord Bracknell
On fire
"Now enough I is not gay"
Exactly where in Berkshire does this family live?
Windsor or Slough?
Exactly where in Berkshire does this family live?
Windsor or Slough?