Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] War: Who do you want to win?







portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
19,070
Ha, ha, ha.

It's funny because they both have nukes and literally a billion+ people could be in mortal danger.

FFS...
It won't come to that, they've clashed a million times and always will. It's tragic the sum of their argument has resulted in a baby or two dying. Idiots. Utter stupidity but ain't that the norm, everywhere. Depressing.
 


portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
19,070
I'll be sad not to be able to ask about the club still not bothering to run its own train service, or about the lack of lactose free toffos in the East Lower, while revealing the detail of my support over the years...


Unnecessary and distasteful - will bring out all the bile and spite that Gaza and Brexit threads produced. So, one last comment before using the delete thread option - can somebody delete it please.

These are a poor thread.
Yes, let's censor what the rest of the world is discussing. 'Cos NSC is where world leaders and people always canvass opinion...
 




portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
19,070
The o/p seems to view this like a sport contest. This is not playing cricket, this war in which people DIE !
People like us. People like the little girl slaughtered yesterday, in the name of striking back for terrorism.
Dont forget they have nuclear bombs. This could get very nasty.
Yes, that;s exactly what I believe and of course Nuclear War is inevitable. It's what I'm hoping for actually.
 








portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
19,070
Children, parents, siblings, friends, colleagues, pets - all are dying in wars.

Limbs are lost. Innocent people often lose everything they have.

It is one of the most depressing realities there is, and not something we should be joking about from the comfort of our (presently) peaceful nation.

The more I reflect on the reasons why the OP created this thread - the more I think he must be an absolute cock who needs to take a serious look at himself in the mirror.
If you looked in the mirror, you probably wouldn't fit. Regardless, you carry on with utter hyperbole and casting dispersions just because your world doesn't contain any reality such as countries taking pot shits at each other which is as old as Adam. Meanwhile the adults can have a conversation about these two old adversaries battling it out again. My money's on India FWIW.
 






portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
19,070
It's not the topic, it's your flippancy, but you knew that already.
Ot your precious nature. I couldn't give a f*** if you're such a snowflake as to find offence. You could have not opened the thread for example, but instead you're here blithering on about your flakiness when you could just answer the question...
 








portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
19,070
The o/p seems to view this like a sport contest. This is not playing cricket, this war in which people DIE !
People like us. People like the little girl slaughtered yesterday, in the name of striking back for terrorism.
Dont forget they have nuclear bombs. This could get very nasty.
War has a habit of doing this, it's a fact of life. But of the two, who would you prefer to win? Me, I'm hoping India does because of the overwhelming number of terrorists Pakistan has produce by comparison. Makes for a safer world, being selfish.
 


Home and Away

Well-known member
Sep 18, 2018
716
There are - history shows if you win a war, you can benefit for hundreds if not thousands of years. Your reply is just so very on brand but it's bullshit.
This not necessarily true... look at Japan and Germany for example. Way more richer and advanced than most of the (so called) winners of the WWII.

But yes, as someone already mentioned.. for the general population there is only blood, sweat and tears... a lot.
 








portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
19,070
This not necessarily true... look at Japan and Germany for example. Way more richer and advanced than most (so called) winners of the WWII.

But yes, as someone already mentioned.. for the general population there are only blood, sweat and tears... a lot.
Of course, but depending on which side and which war. Conquering others is in the human condition, it's shaped our world. We've done well out of after all!
 


Guy Fawkes

The voice of treason
Sep 29, 2007
8,389
~Cop out. It'll come eventually. But in the meantime, where does your loyalty lie?
So you're keen for people be killed :tosser:

Also why do you have a need for people to take a side? - is it so you can declare how right / great the (your) side chosen is, or to be able to challenge those who take a different side from yours ? or is it all just for you to be able to bask in all the death and destruction that may be about to come ?
 




Mustafa II

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2022
2,299
Hove
I'm fine, but thanks for asking. Btw, you get on more peoples nerves than many dos the irony of your post is not missed. Now, answer the question / add an opinion, or bow out. Your choice.

I'm one of the most popular people on NSC and earn this site a SHIT load of money.

You on the other hand have made a very disrespectful trolling thread, either through lack of empathy towards the victims of war, or because you're bored and attention seeking, or both.

Now you're on the defensive because you're being called out on it.

My opinion on your stupid question is, neither - I'm team peace and hoping that war can be avoided.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here