Troy Deeney

[Bry Nylon]

You can see the anger in his face. Think he lost it for a few secs and the red mist come over him.

Certainly seems to have a few anger management / red mist issues. Sentenced to 10 months prison in 2012 for kicking a man in the head during a brawl.

 

[dadams2k11]

Certainly seems to have a few anger management / red mist issues. Sentenced to 10 months prison in 2012 for kicking a man in the head during a brawl.

Sounds like a charming gentleman.

 

[Weststander]

Little Joe Allen rarely gets in trouble. He's a gifted midfield passer.

A clear case of bullying here. The mug will serve a three match ban, when Watford need him.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Deeney charged with violent conduct & gets a 3 game ban.

 

[Dick Head]

Deeney charged with violent conduct & gets a 3 game ban.

[tweet]924421010241282059[/tweet]

 

[The Large One]

OK, help me here.

I know Watford and Stoke have both been charged, but if the referee saw the Deeney incident (by yellow carding him), how come Deeney is being charged as well? The referee seeing the incident also closes the incident, does it not?

What's the rule here?

 

[AmexRuislip]

OK, help me here.

I know Watford and Stoke have both been charged, but if the referee saw the Deeney incident (by yellow carding him), how come Deeney is being charged as well? The referee seeing the incident also closes the incident, does it not?

What's the rule here?

It's quite simple really.
They'll ship him out to on loan one of the Pozzo loan prisons, sorry teams, where all will be forgotten about!!

 

[AZ Gull]

OK, help me here.

I know Watford and Stoke have both been charged, but if the referee saw the Deeney incident (by yellow carding him), how come Deeney is being charged as well? The referee seeing the incident also closes the incident, does it not?

What's the rule here?

From the report in the Watford Observer:-

Watford captain Troy Deeney has until tomorrow evening to respond to a Football Association charge of violent conduct after putting hands on the face of Stoke City's Joe Allen during Saturday's match at Vicarage Road.

The news means that referee Michael Oliver's report must have made clear the official did not see the full extent of the incident at the time, for which both players received yellow cards.

 

[Dick Head]

OK, help me here.

I know Watford and Stoke have both been charged, but if the referee saw the Deeney incident (by yellow carding him), how come Deeney is being charged as well? The referee seeing the incident also closes the incident, does it not?

What's the rule here?

The misconduct was not seen by the match officials at the time but caught on video.

http://www.thefa.com/news/2017/oct/...uspension-watford-stoke-city-joe-allen-311017

 

[The Large One]

The misconduct was not seen by the match officials at the time but caught on video.

http://www.thefa.com/news/2017/oct/...uspension-watford-stoke-city-joe-allen-311017

So what were the yellow cards for?

 

[Thunder Bolt]

So what were the yellow cards for?

The BBC article said it was for squaring up to each other.

 

[Dick Head]

So what were the yellow cards for?

Dunno, unsporting behaviour? Handbags? They obviously didn't see the violent bit.

 

[drew]

It's a bit nasty but let's not forget it was initiated by Allen who persisted coming to Deeney. Stoke were annoyed that Watford didn't give the ball back but the Stoke player wasn't really injured just time wasting as Stoke were in the lead.

 

[The Large One]

It's a bit nasty but let's not forget it was initiated by Allen who persisted coming to Deeney. Stoke were annoyed that Watford didn't give the ball back but the Stoke player wasn't really injured just time wasting as Stoke were in the lead.

What does that have to do with Deeney's behaviour - which is what we're talking about?

Allen got a yellow card, so what's your point?

 

[Weststander]

It's a bit nasty but let's not forget it was initiated by Allen who persisted coming to Deeney. Stoke were annoyed that Watford didn't give the ball back but the Stoke player wasn't really injured just time wasting as Stoke were in the lead.

Footballer walks up to another to have a word. The other digs his grubby fingers into the face of the talker.

Incomparable.

Deeney got his just desserts. Scummy, violent behaviour.

 

[surlyseagull]

Nasty piece of work with serious issues ,the intent on his face and the digging his nails in was not a rash moment but a built up natural anger and aggression .

 

[drew]

What does that have to do with Deeney's behaviour - which is what we're talking about?

Allen got a yellow card, so what's your point?

Not saying Deeney hasn't deserved the punishment but I think Allen should also have been punished more than a yellow. He launched into Deeney and not in the way Westander suggests.

 

[Algernon]

Either way, ugly scenes!

 

[AmexRuislip]

Watford's Adrian Mariappa explains £10,000 loan to Troy Deeney

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42423147

Not sure I would do this IMO

 

[Wrong-Direction]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42423147

Not sure I would do this IMO

Once a thug always a thug

Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk