Mellor 3 Ward 4
Well-known member
What about the Shoreham to Guildford line via Horsham?
The rumour about the £75 million earmarked by the government for the A27 between Lewes and Polegate being dependent on the decision of the Airports Commission about the future of Gatwick Airport is apparently NOT TRUE.I am personally opposed to a second Gatwick runway unless massive transport improvements are promised with it (for some reason the Highways Agency will not consider improvements on the A27 from Lewes to Polegate without a second Gatwick runway).
The rumour about the £75 million earmarked by the government for the A27 between Lewes and Polegate being dependent on the decision of the Airports Commission about the future of Gatwick Airport is apparently NOT TRUE.
At least that's what Secretary of State for Transport, Patrick McLoughlin, told a delegation of parish council representatives who went to see him on 16 March with Norman Baker MP.
According to Norman Baker, all of the Parish Councils between Lewes and Polegate are happy with what the Secretary of State and the Highways Agency are offering - a series of local improvements along the line of the route, with a particular focus on Wilmington crossroads, Selmeston and Firle. Norman Baker is supporting this solution as well.
I thought this was what they were doing now, but not been down there for a while?
"His"? Are you expecting a Labour win?Hopefully ... the new MP will be as supportive of his car-driving constituents in the East as he is of the train users in Lewes.
"His"? Are you expecting a Labour win?
The rumour about the £75 million earmarked by the government for the A27 between Lewes and Polegate being dependent on the decision of the Airports Commission about the future of Gatwick Airport is apparently NOT TRUE.
At least that's what Secretary of State for Transport, Patrick McLoughlin, told a delegation of parish council representatives who went to see him on 16 March with Norman Baker MP.
According to Norman Baker, all of the Parish Councils between Lewes and Polegate are happy with what the Secretary of State and the Highways Agency are offering - a series of local improvements along the line of the route, with a particular focus on Wilmington crossroads, Selmeston and Firle. Norman Baker is supporting this solution as well.
What about the Shoreham to Guildford line via Horsham?
Even before you factor in the ever-increasing population (and whichever form of transport you favour you can point at figures saying its use is rocketing) I'm just waiting for one of the Victorian-built bits of the current narrow and overcrowded London to Brighton line to eventually fail. Will be especially funny if it happens after Gatwick wins the battle to get its extra runway.
Is there any chance of any ****ing joined-up transport thinking in this country? (Answer, not with negative ***** like Baker around, no.)
The rumour about the £75 million earmarked by the government for the A27 between Lewes and Polegate being dependent on the decision of the Airports Commission about the future of Gatwick Airport is apparently NOT TRUE.
At least that's what Secretary of State for Transport, Patrick McLoughlin, told a delegation of parish council representatives who went to see him on 16 March with Norman Baker MP.
According to Norman Baker, all of the Parish Councils between Lewes and Polegate are happy with what the Secretary of State and the Highways Agency are offering - a series of local improvements along the line of the route, with a particular focus on Wilmington crossroads, Selmeston and Firle. Norman Baker is supporting this solution as well.
It is, of course, possible that the Secretary of State has "over-ruled" the Highways Agency (or at least that is the impression that he has given to Norman Baker and the local parish councils). I'll investigate further, with the contacts that I have.Lord B, I got this from a Highways Agency study, not from the media. It discussed a number of options, from full dual carriageway, which they decided did not represent value for money, to various local improvements, such as bypasses for Selmeston and Wilmington, which they decided did not meet the intended objectives. They went on to say that they might review the decision if a second runway at Gatwick was given the go-ahead. I don't have the link to hand, but I got it from the SABRE roads forum, www.sabre-roads.org.uk. I think a decision has to be taken: is this a local road for commuting, or is it part of the long-distance network? If the former, local improvements might be sufficient, if not it either needs a large-scale improvement, or a new East-West link, perhaps further north, needs to be considered.
Oh don't get me started on the A27 (Lord B and I will fall out badly!). It's the main reason why the Tour de France is unlikely to come back to Sussex. When it was here in the 1990s the organisers moaned about the 'primitive' road infrastructure, especially when they were all trying to move west for the next stage. Still, Arundel might be getting a by-pass! Whoopi-do!Of course not. Most government ministers are not interested in public transport, and the Transport brief is seen as one to be promoted out of - whereas in fact it should be regarded as one of the most important. Without proper transport, the economy doesn't work. I've got to go to Bournemouth on Monday and my choices are a slow rail line or one of the worst roads in Britain. At least there are no replacement buses.
By the way, last time I was on a replacement bus, it caught fire, so I ended up on a replacement replacement bus....
Agreed. The bus just isn't a realistic alternative for anything other than short journeys. I said on another thread that a few years ago my wife and I used to occasionally go from Brighton to Tunbridge Wells and back. The journey was long, frustrating and very uncomfortable as bus seats aren't built for long-distance travel. (The fact I'm calling Brighton to Tunbridge Wells 'long distance' says it all). Lewes is about as far as I can comfortably go on a bus from Brighton; even Worthing's too far, the train is SO much better.
No. It would be the railway line between Tunbridge Wells and London.A rail link between Brighton and Tunbridge Wells, and then up to London would be fantastic.
It is, of course, possible that the Secretary of State has "over-ruled" the Highways Agency (or at least that is the impression that he has given to Norman Baker and the local parish councils). I'll investigate further, with the contacts that I have.
No. It would be the railway line between Tunbridge Wells and London.
It's quicker to travel from Brighton to London than from Tunbridge Wells to London. Adding in the journey time between Brighton and Tunbridge Wells would make the overall journey really unattractive.
"His"? Are you expecting a Labour win?