Seagull on the wing
New member
If it ain't broke...why fix it?
Didn't see the programme so don't know exactly what Sugar said, but he's being a bit naive picking on football. The problem is that ANY business can go bust and leave small suppliers stranded (I've been owed money by three different companies that have declared themselves insolvent and just carried on trading under another name), football clubs just exploit this. The PL and FL couldn't prevent this but they could be tougher on clubs that go into admin - the current points penalty is just pathetic.
You're right to highlight Sugar's part in this. It takes some chutzpah for a man partly responsible for the greed and inequality in modern football to complain about finances running out of control.
Personally, I'd like to see any club going into administration relegated at the end of that season (and if they're already going down - like Pompey - that go down two divisions). And if a club goes into admin again, within a ten year period, they get relegated two divisions. That would be a more appropriate penalty.
I think the problem is more than just finances, it's the dominance of the likes of Man U, Chelsea etc I'd like to see the top clubs bugger off to the European league that's been spoken about for so long and leave the rest of us to get on with a proper First Division.
Which happens more than you'd imagine through The PFA.I concede that the draft system as is won't work. Perhaps a SUPER tax of 70% on players wages over £250,000 pa. Some of this tax money could go into a hardship pot for the players that don't get paid due to their club struggling to make ends meet, like 'Accrington Stanley'.
I concede that the draft system as is won't work. Perhaps a SUPER tax of 70% on players wages over £250,000 pa.
what has the pay of a handfull of players got to do with the mediocrity of mid-table teams, or the financial problems of small lower league teams? seems to have gone off on a tangent to an issue about finances. i joke before, seriously what exactly is the question?
It hasn't, but pretty much every player in the prem is on over £250k p/a. It bridge the gap between the prem and lower leagues a little. THIS is a separate issue entirely I realise, but still an important one.
The REAL question related to this thread is that the prem as is will carry on being a place run by 3/4 teams and propped up by the other 16 until we have reforms. Admittedly their needs to be enough support from the OTHER teams fans in order to raise this as a pressing issue.
The one area they could try and even things out is in regards to clubs debts.
The problem is the likes of Man U, Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal etc can be huge amounts of money in debt but held almost unaccountable for these debts while being allowed to continue on spending because some rich prick will always bail them out long before they attempt to repay the debts.
To reign such clubs and their spending in a sanction on signings should be put in place where by if you're in debt to a certain amount you are severely restricted by whom you can sign, similar to what happens to clubs under administration.
A draft won't restrict how much they can spend, but sanctions placed upon them can. Which hopefully could lead to a more even playing field.