5mins-from-amex
New member
Well done Gus got it spot on today 
That is what happens when we play two wingers!
- Thread starter 5mins-from-amex
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Rich Suvner
Skint years RIP
When I saw he was playing Lua Lua and Buckley I did get excited. Fingers crossed we stay positive.
Having the class of SD and Orlandi tucked inside makes all the difference.
St Patricks Day
Banned
- Feb 3, 2013
- 398
Well done Gus got it spot on today
Should play with 2 wingers all the time at home, let the opposition worry about us and let us take the game to them. If we played with wingers then I think we'd be much higher up the table.
Albumen
Don't wait for me!
Yup. Oh hang on ....
mreprice
Active member
Two wingers good. Three wingers (inc Vicente) not as good.
Boris Yeltsin
MR PRESIDENT to you, mate
Vicente should be an impact sub. If we start with him then everything generally goes through him. Was it a coincidence last year when we couldn't win a game when he was playing? I don't believe in coincidence.
Washie
Well-known member
He used to play left wing for Valencia and for spain.
Seasidesage
New member
Leave our best player by a country mile out? Great idea...
Vicente isn't the problem. He is the best player in the Championship. OK he didn't play as well as he can, but he is hardly to blame for our failure to take the three or four clear cut chances we created. (He is responsible for one!) The others need to take more responsibility when he is playing, but it is telling that when he does, our players constantly give the ball to him. Wonder why? Could it be that they have seen him at close quarters and they appreciate just how good he is?
We need to find a way to make it work, because in the big games we hopefully have to come, he is our best chance of actually winning a play off...
Vicente isn't the problem. He is the best player in the Championship. OK he didn't play as well as he can, but he is hardly to blame for our failure to take the three or four clear cut chances we created. (He is responsible for one!) The others need to take more responsibility when he is playing, but it is telling that when he does, our players constantly give the ball to him. Wonder why? Could it be that they have seen him at close quarters and they appreciate just how good he is?
We need to find a way to make it work, because in the big games we hopefully have to come, he is our best chance of actually winning a play off...
South Stand Rebel
New member
- Sep 6, 2012
- 169
Didn't think two wingers worked last night, Charlton found it quite easy to defend against as the movement of the ball forward and out to the wing was extremely predictable. Vicente was always having to give the ball to Lualua as there were few options available. Lua lua couldn't cross the ball for toffee last night. Really needed Hammond on for Greer to add some dimension going forward.
Braders
Abi Fletchers Gimpboy
Ex-blooming-actly.
Perkino
Well-known member
- Dec 11, 2009
- 6,083
With Charlton parking the bus then Vicente was the right choice to unlock their defence with a slick pass however we didn't require two wingers.
I would have had a solid spine to the team and then got Bridge and Calderon involved with attacking as wide options.
Kuzcszak
Calderon, Greer, Upson, Bridge
Dave, Hammond, Briddcut, Vicente
Ulloa, Buckley
Allowing us to get men into the box to finish moves in amongst a large number of Charlton players. Also having Lualua and Orlandi as options to stretch a tired defence after 65 mins
I would have had a solid spine to the team and then got Bridge and Calderon involved with attacking as wide options.
Kuzcszak
Calderon, Greer, Upson, Bridge
Dave, Hammond, Briddcut, Vicente
Ulloa, Buckley
Allowing us to get men into the box to finish moves in amongst a large number of Charlton players. Also having Lualua and Orlandi as options to stretch a tired defence after 65 mins