Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Swp









dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
17,047
London
the kid is so inconsistant though!!

To be honest though he probably doesn't mind not playing every game when he's on about 60k a week!
 


Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
59,241
hassocks
dwayne said:
the kid is so inconsistant though!!

To be honest though he probably doesn't mind not playing every game when he's on about 60k a week!

Thats the thing isnt it - would you care?

He is going along the Parker route.

If you where a young player would you go to Chelsea anymore?
 


1

1066gull

Guest
Chelsea buy the second rate players who are first rate players with there opponents to prevent them buying them.

Wankers.
 




B.M.F

New member
Aug 2, 2003
7,272
wherever the money is
A van der Meyde said:
Chelsea buy the second rate players who are first rate players with there opponents to prevent them buying them.

Wankers.

OK:rolleyes: :jester:
 


mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
22,446
England
A van der Meyde said:
Chelsea buy the second rate players who are first rate players with there opponents to prevent them buying them.

Wankers.

that is true. arsenal wanted swp, so chelsea nicked him
 








Da Man Clay

T'Blades
Dec 16, 2004
16,318
Kinky Gerbils said:
Thats the thing isnt it - would you care?

He is going along the Parker route.

If you where a young player would you go to Chelsea anymore?
[/QUOTE

Of course you would care. I would as I hope would most footballers. Id rather be played 30k a week and play every week than 60k a week to play in the reserves.
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
74,409
DAMANCLAY said:
I would as I hope would most footballers. Id rather be played 30k a week and play every week than 60k a week to play in the reserves.

Some would, some wouldn't. It's a short career, and you're a long time not playing once you're out of the game. At which point, 60K goes a lot further than 30K. Twice as far probably.
 




Da Man Clay

T'Blades
Dec 16, 2004
16,318
Tom Hark said:
Some would, some wouldn't. It's a short career, and you're a long time not playing once you're out of the game. At which point, 60K goes a lot further than 30K. Twice as far probably.

I see where you coming from but 30k a week for lets say 10 years give a take is

£15,600000. Thats before any sponsorship deals and bonuses ECT.

Which probably will take it up to about 20 mil. If you cant make that last 50 odd years then you're doing something wrong!
 


Wardy

NSC's Benefits Guru
Oct 9, 2003
11,219
In front of the PC
DAMANCLAY said:
I see where you coming from but 30k a week for lets say 10 years give a take is

£15,600000. Thats before any sponsorship deals and bonuses ECT.

Which probably will take it up to about 20 mil. If you cant make that last 50 odd years then you're doing something wrong!

And thats before you do those after dinner events, write a book or 2 and bring out a range of aftershave.
 




Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,831
Location Location
Sad state of affairs when a player puts the £££ before his footballing career. SWP would still earn an absolute fortune during his career had he stayed at Man City for another couple of years. Instead, he's pissing it up the wall playing 20 minute cameos every other week

What a shame. What a waste.
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here