Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Come on then, let's be having ya all as:
WE WON 2 - 0
WE WON 2 - 0
Tooting Gull said:
And you have to say Sven got the subs right - for once. No Hargreaves. Just as well, I think I'd have spontaneously combusted at 0-0 if he had.
Withdean Wanderer said:I'd have happily put Hargreaves on for Lampard, because his finishing today almost cost us.
He was trying to be too flash, and when he was sensible with the ball it was passed backwards. Thus, Gerrard would be let loose
Kinky Gerbils said:Didnt his subs change the game?
Chopper West said:Lennon created the space for Becks to cross for the first goal, so I would say yes
Icy Gull said:If that was McGhee in charge most of you on this thread would be lambasting him, get your tongues out of Sven's arse, that was a clueless performance and as for leaving one man back, a decent striker would have scored a few against us, lucky it was only a Championship standard striker.
Shit Shit Shit was was it was and the manager is truely World Class clueless.
Kinky Gerbils said:bollocks - most of the Mcghee bashers didnt have a go (well i didnt) if Brighton won - so after about 7 games last year.
tommy boy said:yeah i wish he'd brought on owen "goal machine" hargreaves![]()
Withdean Wanderer said:If it meant getting Gerrard behind the front men, then yes.
tommy boy said:so when you said hargreaves you actually meant CARRICK didn't you?![]()
Withdean Wanderer said:If it meant getting Gerrard behind the front men, then yes.
brightonfan_86 said:The subs Sven made changed the game, Lennon was class down the right flank and diffinitely deserves a starting place against the Swedes, I think Rooney should play against Swedes aswell.
When will people stop moaning?![]()