Sussex v Worcestershire the last hope

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
I still can't believe Surrey declared so early. Lancs would have to go for it whatever the target was, so I don't understand why they declared with less than 525 or so... :nono:

all the surrey players have got money on at 15-1 probably!
 




hart's shirt

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2003
10,279
Kitbag in Dubai
Lancs 178/2 off 40 overs - just under 4.5 an over.
 




JJ McClure

Go Jags
Jul 7, 2003
10,877
Hassocks
God damn Slurrey c*nts, screwed as right over they have.
 






hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
61,668
Chandlers Ford
4 more to add to the mushymeter, when I am next at my PC. Good old mushy :mushy: :bowdown:

Shame that Law is going to snatch the title from our grasp. I predict that everyone's favourite player Dominic Cork will smash the winning runs.
 




Seagull over NZ

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,607
Bristol
It resembles the fact that Slurrey have nothing to play for. I'll be gutted if Lancs grab this but fair play, if they chase 490 to win then fair play. A Long way to go yet.
 






Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,041
Living In a Box
Surrey don't exactly seem to be trying but there is still a way to go.
 








Barry Izbak

U.T.A.
Dec 7, 2005
7,336
Lancing By Sea
ALLE - f***ing - LUIAH !

LAXMAN CT RAMPS 100

:bigwave:
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,041
Living In a Box
Brilliant
 






Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick
Slurrey aren't even making a fight of it.

Oh well, Lancs are rightfully champions anyway.
 




Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick
Law and Croft out in same over

307/5
 




Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick
Tea

Lancs need 181 off 37 overs @ 4.89
with 5 wickets left

Wouldn't it be a shame if they lose by 1 run?
 
Last edited:




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top